#1 New game from Blizzard
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:31 pm
LibriumArcana.Games
Fantasy Gaming, SciFi and Irreverence
http://libriuma.phpwebhosting.com/forum/
New game from Blizzard
http://libriuma.phpwebhosting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1903
Page 1 of 1
#2
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:33 pm
fuckers need to make SC2 first!
#3
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:19 pm
Scott....it's a April Fools joke obviously...
it makes me sad in the pants..
it makes me sad in the pants..
#4
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 10:14 pm
April Fools? Probably.
But they (and by 'they' i mean 'anybody') needs to make a kick ass futuristic/ post apocalyptic MMO. Fallout MMO anybody? OH, man, I'd never come out.
But they (and by 'they' i mean 'anybody') needs to make a kick ass futuristic/ post apocalyptic MMO. Fallout MMO anybody? OH, man, I'd never come out.
#5
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 10:22 pm
they made one a few years back by the name of Neocron. Damned good MMO, only one I ever actively enjoyed playing. I played in the 1st - 6th beta. It was still to buggy and unbalanced but the company released it anyway. It flopped majorly.
#6
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:41 am
Well I always love Blizzard. The first time I played StarCraft, I thought it was yet another FPS, but the gameplay balance and the excellent storyline is more than enough to make it up.
#7
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:53 am
There is something very wrong in this post. I'm not saying what it is. But if its not fixed soon, I'll snap.Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman wrote:Well I always love Blizzard. The first time I played StarCraft, I thought it was yet another FPS, but the gameplay balance and the excellent storyline is more than enough to make it up.
#8
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 12:37 pm
The problem with a Starcraft MMO--
Protoss and Human I can see. But Zerg? No. Not really. It'd be all 'kekeke... come on, man, who wants to rush this outpost? Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?'
Protoss and Human I can see. But Zerg? No. Not really. It'd be all 'kekeke... come on, man, who wants to rush this outpost? Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?'
#9
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 12:47 pm
And that is different from World of Warcraft's Horde Side... how?
#10
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:11 pm
It's all in the principle of the thing. The Zerg are essentially xenomorphs; they exist to attack and devour. No individualism aside from Kerrigan, who was a special case. The Horde, at least, have intelligence and individuality, and their players are capable of going on individual quests and the like. Zerg? Not so much.Dakarne wrote:And that is different from World of Warcraft's Horde Side... how?
#11
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:59 pm
Hey, StarCraft is an FPS; the acronym stands for Freal Ptime Strategy, am I correct?Ace Pace wrote:There is something very wrong in this post. I'm not saying what it is. But if its not fixed soon, I'll snap.Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman wrote:Well I always love Blizzard. The first time I played StarCraft, I thought it was yet another FPS, but the gameplay balance and the excellent storyline is more than enough to make it up.
#12
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:51 am
Adds LITERAL definition to the word "zergging".