Page 1 of 1

#1 Vista DRM madness

Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 7:03 am
by Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman
:shock: No, I kid you not.
Disabling of Functionality


Vista's content protection mechanism only allows protected content to be sent over interfaces that also have content-protection facilities built in. Currently the most common high-end audio output interface is S/PDIF (Sony/Philips Digital Interface Format). Most newer audio cards, for example, feature TOSlink digital optical output for high-quality sound reproduction, and even the latest crop of motherboards with integrated audio provide at least coax (and often optical) digital output. Since S/PDIF doesn't provide any content protection, Vista requires that it be disabled when playing protected content. In other words if you've invested a pile of money into a high-end audio setup fed from a digital output, you won't be able to use it with protected content. Similarly, component (YPbPr) video will be disabled by Vista's content protection, so the same applies to a high-end video setup fed from component video.
....and there are still many, many more....

#2

Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:52 am
by Ace Pace
So. filled.with.FUD.

WHY Don't people actully TRY vista?

#3

Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:55 am
by Destructionator XV
Even if we assume this is all 100% true, look at the facts. If Vista didn't support the DRM, you would have no high definition content whatsoever.

So would you rather have the restriction and the content, which doesn't affect most things, which the industries are forcing on Microsoft, or nothing?

#4

Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:13 am
by SirNitram
Destructionator XV wrote:Even if we assume this is all 100% true, look at the facts. If Vista didn't support the DRM, you would have no high definition content whatsoever.
Yea, right. The studios are gonna hemorrage money because the MPAA is stuck with an outdated business model. That'll happen when pigs fly out of my ass.