Do I even have to say anything?Both Russia and Georgia violated the laws of war when they clashed in South Ossetia last August, failing to protect civilians, Human Rights Watch says.
The New York-based international rights organisation has produced a report on the conflict, based on more than 460 interviews done in the region.
The group accuses Georgia of attacking South Ossetia "with blatant disregard for the safety of civilians".
"Indiscriminate" Russian air and ground attacks killed many civilians, it says.
Call for justice
Russia allowed South Ossetian forces to kill, beat, rape and threaten civilians, Human Rights Watch (HRW) says, demanding that those responsible be brought to justice, and their victims compensated.
map
During the conflict in and around the breakaway region in Georgia, all parties insisted they had done everything possible to minimise civilian casualties.
Georgia's attempts to regain control of South Ossetia were repelled by Russian forces.
Rachel Denber, HRW's Europe and Central Asia director, said much of the argument after the conflict had focused on who was to blame for starting it.
But that "misses the point, which is the urgent need to hold all who are responsible accountable and to allow displaced people to return home safely," she said.
Human Rights Watch condemned Georgia's use of Grad multiple rocket launchers in civilian areas. The rockets "cannot be targeted with sufficient precision to distinguish between civilian and military objects," the group said.
It said both Russia and Georgia used cluster munitions, "causing civilian deaths and putting more civilians at risk by leaving behind unstable 'minefields' of unexploded bomblets".
"Instead of protecting civilians, Russian forces allowed South Ossetian forces who followed in their path to engage in wanton and widescale pillage and burning of Georgian homes and to kill, beat, rape, and threaten civilians," said Ms Denber. "Such deliberate attacks are war crimes."
More than 20,000 ethnic Georgians who fled the conflict remain displaced, HRW says.
S Ossetia 'war crimes' condemned
Moderator: frigidmagi
- frigidmagi
- Dragon Death-Marine General
- Posts: 14757
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
- 19
- Location: Alone and unafraid
#1 S Ossetia 'war crimes' condemned
BBC
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
- General Havoc
- Mr. Party-Killbot
- Posts: 5245
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
- 19
- Location: The City that is not Frisco
- Contact:
#4
All three sides?Mayabird wrote:Wow, it's exactly what I was saying before. There was no "good guy" and "bad guy" here, like people stupidly try to think. Everybody was guilty, all three sides. What a mess.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...
Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
- Mayabird
- Leader of the Marching Band
- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 7:53 pm
- 19
- Location: IA > GA
- Contact:
#5
Russia, Georgia, and South Ossetia. To the latter, I can only sarcastically say, "Great job on committing war crimes in your own supposed microstate." Of course, what a lot of them want really is to reunite with Russia. Those people were driving out people with Georgian sympathies and ancestry, while people who wanted to still be a part of Georgia were driving out people of Russian sympathies and ancestry. Would that make it four sides, or just two?