Here's the whole article.
A mother accused her daughter's school of discriminating against Christians yesterday after the teenager was suspended for refusing to take off a crucifix necklace.
Sam Morris, 16, was sent home from Sinfin Community School in Derby for breaking a school policy that bans jewellery.
Last night her mother, Debra, said that Sikh children were allowed to wear a steel bracelet, known as a kara, for religious reasons and said her daughter had every right to express her faith.
Education officials were unrepentant, however, and said that Sikhs are required by religion to wear items of jewellery, whereas Christians are not.
Mrs Morris, 37, said: "Sam has worn this necklace for more than three years. No one has told her to take it off before, and she doesn't want to remove it.
"She thinks it's very unfair when other people are allowed to wear religious symbols. It just ends up creating a divide between the pupils.
"Everyone is being told that they should be living in unity, but this rule is not right. Sam has just as much right to celebrate her own religion."
She said her daughter believed in God but did not regularly attend church.
Miss Morris, who is studying for GCSEs, was told on Thursday by the deputy headmaster to remove the necklace. When she refused, she was sent home for the day and told not to return until she agrees not to wear it.
Mrs Saunders, from Sinfin, said she allowed her daughter back to the 1,070-pupil comprehensive yesterday, minus the crucifix, because she did not want her to miss lessons.
She said: "Sam needs to get her GCSEs so she can go on to college. Although I'm still furious, in the long run her future is more important. But I'm still angry."
She said she will raise the matter with school governors.
Howard Jones, the deputy head who sent Miss Morris home, said the one-day suspension was a "last resort" after a 30-minute conversation failed to persuade her to take it off.
He said: "There was a long period of persuasion with her and she was given time. It was only at the end of that that I reluctantly had to exclude her for a day. I met her mother today and readmitted her daughter."
He said the school policy was "even-handed and fair".
He added: "As a Christian I don't have to wear a crucifix but Sikhs don't have that option and we have to be understanding. We live in a multi-faith society."
Derby city council urged any school imposing such regulations to look carefully at individual circumstances before issuing a total ban.
A spokesman said: "It is lawful to ban crucifixes while allowing other religious symbols, but whether it is desirable is another matter.
"For some people wearing a crucifix could be a deeply religious gesture, which is why personal needs should be taken into account."
This is disgusting, and by no means fair or balanced.
If this was in America you can bet they could sue and win (Not that it would happen, at least in more than a few places). Because of the fact that it is not being endorsed by the government but is a person using their freedom of religion to express their views without the disruption of others.
That England still has some law that says 'some religious symbols can be not allowed, but others can be.' sends up so many red flags. Frankly, if I were the girl, this would only make me wear the crucifix more, not because of any religious faith, which she doesn't seem to have in any great amount, but for the fact that it's not allowed. I can't wait for hundreds of kids in that school to end up suspended as well for the fact that they'll start wearing religious symbols. Because as we all know, if it's banned, it's popular.
