Pakistan law change 'un-Islamic'

[frigidmagi]

BBC

Pakistan's six-party religious alliance has condemned government moves to change controversial Islamic laws.
Siraju-ul-Haq, a senior member of the MMA alliance, told the BBC the government was "following a Western agenda to secularise Pakistan".

He was speaking a day after the bill to repeal the laws was tabled, sparking angry scenes in parliament.

The Hudood ordinance dates from 1979 and imposes strict punishments for such crimes as rape, theft and adultery.

We reject this amendment bill from Pakistan army headquarters... because it aims at 'divide and rule'

MMA minister Siraju-ul-Haq

Critics of the Hudood ordinance say it discriminates against women and fails to differentiate between rape and adultery.

Under one law, rape victims face prosecution for adultery, unless they produce four male witnesses. This makes it almost impossible to prosecute rapes. 'Shocking'

Mr Haq, senior minister for finance, planning and development in North West Frontier Province where the MMA is in power, accused the government of "ulterior motives".

"We reject this amendment bill from Pakistan army headquarters... because it aims at 'divide and rule'," he told the BBC Urdu service in London.

"The government must focus on more important issues like education, poverty alleviation, price rises and the interference of the military in government affairs."

He said moves to repeal the Shariah laws were "the spirit of Islam".

In Pakistan, Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz criticised the MMA's response to the bill, calling it "shocking".

He said the proposals were aimed at bringing Pakistani law into line with Islamic injunctions promoting women's rights.

The bill was briefly debated on Monday before the Speaker referred it to a committee for review, Pakistan TV said.

It is not clear when voting might take place.

[Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman]

Yup. Islamic fundamentalism has been very strong in Pakistan, thanks to the Zia Ul-Haq regime . What I can never understand is why the United States supported the religious facist on the first place.

[Stofsk]

What I can never understand is why the United States supported the religious facist on the first place.

The Soviet Union. The Cold War. Godless Communists. Allies of convenience etcetera etcetera.

[Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman]

Well take a look at the cost: IIRC the Pakistani Moslems were more secular during the time of Ali Bhutto, but the Zia Ul-Haq regime had enabled the fundamentalists and extremists to dominate the people and the way they live. :sad:

[frigidmagi]

To be blunt KAN, the fundalmentist in Pakistan have always seem to enjoy a good deal of public support.