Page 1 of 1

#1 Defeated Lieberman to run alone

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:24 am
by frigidmagi
BBC
Senator Joe Lieberman has filed papers to stand as an independent in mid-term elections, a day after losing the Democratic Party's nomination.

"My mind is made up... I'm committed to this campaign," the veteran senator told NBC's Today television show.

Mr Lieberman says he easily garnered the 7,500 signatures needed to endorse his independent candidacy.

But his defeat in Connecticut to newcomer Ned Lamont was widely seen as an expression of anti-war feeling.

Mr Lieberman, a senator for 18 years, had been harshly criticised in his home state for his support for the Iraq war, and his perceived closeness to Republican President George W Bush.


Joe Lieberman has been an effective Democratic senator... But the perception was that he was too close to George Bush
Leading Democrats Harry Reid and Sen Chuck Schumer

In Tuesday's primary, Democratic voters were asked to decide which candidate would stand for the party in November's elections for the Senate and House of Representatives.

With most of the votes counted, results showed Mr Lamont - founder of a cable television company and a political novice - to have won with 52% compared to Mr Lieberman's 48%.

His defeat sent a message to politicians of all colours that Iraq is becoming a political liability, reports the BBC's Nick Miles in Washington.

Papers filed

Mr Lieberman had suggested he might run as an independent if he lost his ticket to run as the Democratic nominee in November, and he wasted no time, filing a petition to run on Wednesday morning.


LIEBERMAN CAREER
1942: Born in Stamford, Connecticut
1970: Elected to Connecticut State Senate
1983: Elected as Connecticut attorney general
1989: Wins bid for US Senate
2000: First Jewish candidate for vice president
Unsuccessful bid for 2004 presidential nomination

His petition received 18,000 signatures, Mr Lieberman's campaign said - more than double the minimum of 7,500. Mr Lieberman has formed a new party for his candidacy, called Connecticut for Lieberman.

"I'll always take the calls of friends, but my mind is made up. I'm going forward. I'm going forward because I'm fed up with all the partisanship in Washington that stops us getting anything done," Mr Lieberman told the Today show.

Asked if there was anyone who could dissuade him, he said: "Respectfully no. I'm committed to this campaign."

Backing for Lamont

Meanwhile Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada and Sen Chuck Schumer of New York - the chairman of the party's Senate campaign committee - have pledged their full support for Mr Lamont.

Ned Lamont celebrates winning the Democratic nomination in Connecticut on 8 August
Leading Democrats have voiced support for Lamont

In a statement on the campaign committee website, they said: "The Democratic voters of Connecticut have spoken... Congratulations to Ned on his victory and on a race well run.

"Joe Lieberman has been an effective Democratic senator... But the perception was that he was too close to George Bush and this election was, in many respects, a referendum on the president more than anything else."

If the signatures on Mr Lieberman's petition for candidacy are approved, it sets up a three-way race with Mr Lamont and the Republican candidate Alan Schlesinger.
Okay first thing first, congrats to Lamont for winning the Democrat primary. He ran a tight campaign and won the right to step forward as the choice of the democrat voters. Because of this officals of the democratic party are now duty bound to support him and if they do not, they should leave or be thrown out of the party.

That being said, I believe Liberman has every right to run in the general election. Victory or defeat in a primary does not entitle anyone to anything expect the chance to attempt to appeal to a larger part of the population. What Liberman does now is not some attempt to overthrow the democratic process, it is democracy in action.

We have heard from a small segment of the population, now we will hear from every regstered voter in the state.

#2

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:05 pm
by Josh
I'll agree he has every right to do this. The Democrats also have every right to hate his guts and have an overwhelming urge to curbstomp him for it, though.

#3

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:26 pm
by SirNitram
He has every right to run alone.

And I have every right to call him a weasaly, whiny, Rove-Cocksucker.

#4

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:27 pm
by Comrade Tortoise
Indeed. His problem is that he has no loyalty but to Lieberman. He HAS to know that he will split the Dem vote, and basically hand the election to the GOP and give them a seat for 6 years in a constituency that they do NOT represent demographically.

#5

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:34 pm
by frigidmagi
Actually Turtle, from what I'm reading the Repubician canidate as about much chance as spit on a hot grill. Seriously, the last poll showed him with 9% of the fucking vote to Lamont getting 21% and Liberman 50% (this can all easily change, it's just a fucking poll and I openly doubt the worthiness of any poll).

Hell from what I've heard, there are people in the Republician party who are calling for their canidate to toss in the towel so his supporters can back Liberman (before anyone whines, Lamont has pretty much proven he hates the guts of the Republicians. If you would a Republician, which would you prefer the guy who will work with you or the guy who wants to eat your face?)

#6

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:04 pm
by Josh
So essentially he's the Democratic version of Jeffords. Well, that's his call and Connecticut's call.