Page 1 of 1

#1 Congress sets record for # of votes.

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:31 pm
by SirNitram
The Politico.
They may be bogged down in debate over children's health, appropriations and Iraq, but nobody can say the House isn't prolific in its most fundamental duty -- voting on legislation.

The House last week held its 943rd roll call vote of the year, breaking the previous record of 942 votes, a mark set in 1978. The vote was on a procedural motion related to a mortgage foreclosure bill. When the House adjourned on Oct. 4 for the long weekend, the chamber had reached 948 roll call votes, putting Democrats on pace to easily eclipse 1,000 votes on the House floor in 2007.

Last year, the Republican controlled House held 543 votes, and for historical comparison, the last time there was a shift in power in Congress, Republicans held 885 roll call votes in 1995. The Senate, which has held 363 votes this year, isn't on pace to break any records, but has already surpassed the 2006 Senate mark of 279 votes.

Just what this all means is up for debate. Democrats say they're living up to promises made during the 2006 campaign, when they said they would worker harder, remain in session more days and hold more votes on American priorities.

“Not only did we finish the work the previous Congress left undone, we advanced our new direction agenda, with nearly 70 percent of our key measures receiving significant bipartisan support," said Kristie Greco, spokesman for House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.).

Republicans who have tried to attach the "do nothing" label to the Democratic Congress, of course, have a different take on the record.

"Never mistake activity for achievement," said Kevin Smith, a spokesman for House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), attributing the quote to UCLA basketball legend John Wooden.
Of course, with the GOP set to use three times the number of filibusters, not all is sunshine and puppies.

Of course, this schedule of actually working has upset some people.

More Politico!
House Republicans say there is a growing list of reasons to call for congressional career quits, from tighter travel restrictions to lobby-reform requirements and the likelihood of continuing minority status.

Yet only nine members of the GOP caucus have so far announced retirements. If you were a House Republican, would you run for reelection?

Rep. Ray LaHood (R-Ill.), 61, one of those who announced he’s packing it in, said that the Democrats’ new five-day workweek made traveling back home that much more difficult.

“I do think the schedule and the flying is a huge pain for people, particularly those who are from the Midwest or even further West,â€

#2

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:59 pm
by frigidmagi
I think you overstate the case somewhat. I do actually feel some sympathy for people who have to shuttle between the western states and D.C. at the expense of time with their families.

On the flip side they did volunteer for this and this is actually less then the demands on military families in this current time of war so while I have some sympathy, I'm not about to suggest any great change in matters.

#3

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:43 pm
by SirNitram
frigidmagi wrote:I think you overstate the case somewhat. I do actually feel some sympathy for people who have to shuttle between the western states and D.C. at the expense of time with their families.

On the flip side they did volunteer for this and this is actually less then the demands on military families in this current time of war so while I have some sympathy, I'm not about to suggest any great change in matters.
As someone whose father had a far longer commute at times.. No, I don't feel much sympathy. Maybe that makes me bad. I really do wonder how many leave their families at home, as there's been some hubbub in the past few years about election eligibility(IE, do you live in your state as opposed to D.C.) of some people.