Page 1 of 1

#1 Only(?) in Texas: the 4060 year sentence.

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:01 pm
by The Silence and I
Link


WEATHERFORD, Texas - A man was sentenced to more than 4,000 years in prison Wednesday for sexually assaulting three teenage girls.

A day after finding James Kevin Pope guilty, jurors sentenced him to 40 life prison terms — one for each sex assault conviction — and 20 years for each of the three sexual performance of a child convictions.

At the request of prosecutors, state District Judge Graham Quisenberry ordered Pope to serve the sentences consecutively, adding up to 4,060 years. He will be eligible for parole in the year 3209, according to the Parker County District Attorney's Office.

"We believe it was a just result," prosecutor Robert DuBoise said, adding that he was "overwhelmed" with the judge's decision to stack the sentences.

Pope, 43, abused the girls for nearly two years. It came to authorities' attention earlier this year after Pope made several inappropriate comments to a friend, who notified Child Protective Services.

During the trial, the teens testified about the abuse, and their sexually explicit photographs were shown as evidence.

'Traumatic'
But Rick Alley, Pope's defense lawyer, told jurors in closing arguments that the victims were incapable of understanding what happened, the Weatherford Democrat reported in its Wednesday online edition.

"If it was as traumatic as they indicate, they would be able to give you (specific dates and times of the incidents). Simply because it's shocking doesn't make it true," Alley said.

During the sentencing phase of the trial, a U.S. Secret Service agent testified that while examining Pope's home computer, he found more than 200 images of child porn.

Later Wednesday, some jurors said the case was difficult because of the subject matter.

"We were careful not to make any mistakes in viewing and evaluating the evidence," said juror Dale Lewis.


<><><><><>

Me, I think this is what a molester of his level of achievement has earned for himself. I found this on SD.net/SDN and some commentators there felt differently so I wondered how opinions over here might pan out.

#2

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:03 pm
by SirNitram
It's just stupid. 'Life Without Parole'. Okay? It's not hard. Don't wank off to thousands of years in jail. You sound like a fucking prick when you rule like that. In four thousand years, you and he will be fucking dust and no one will care.

#3

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:14 pm
by frigidmagi
Life without Parole requires a different set of legal hoops and can be overturned in a single appeal. Here he has to pretty much get every single sentence reduced. That's going to be harder.

This isn't the first time this has been done and it has been done by every single state in the union. It's when they decide they really don't want you to ever get Parole.

#4

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:17 pm
by The Silence and I
SirNitram wrote:It's just stupid. 'Life Without Parole'. Okay? It's not hard. Don't wank off to thousands of years in jail. You sound like a fucking prick when you rule like that. In four thousand years, you and he will be fucking dust and no one will care.
Meh. In practical terms it makes no difference (or maybe it's better, according to frigid's post betwixt ours), so who cares if you sound like a prick? I would expect you of all people to understand the desire to sound like a prick now and then :razz:

#5

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:30 pm
by Batman
I didn't know the mechanics behind it but the way frigid explains it DOES make sense, and I DID know it has been done before. I guess now I know why :grin:
And sorry, I couldn't agree more. See you at the Enterprise-Ys christening ceremony, bastard.

#6

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:52 pm
by Derek Thunder
This is a serious punishment in Texas, where 4060 years... I mean, that's 2/3rds of the age of the earth.

#7

Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 2:59 am
by The Cleric
It's relevant because "Life without Parole" doesn't REALLY mean "the rest of your natural life with a 0.0% chance of being eligible for parole" anymore.

#8

Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:32 am
by Comrade Tortoise
Um... yeah, it does. Without parole means no parole. Now, a regular life sentence is a tad different, as there are usual parole conditions. Now, if you mean appeals... yeah. If they get rid of one conviction, the others stick. However with the appeals, if he wins those it typically means the entire trial was bupkiss, and he should not remain imprisoned. So the 4 thousand year sentence is still a bit silly

#9

Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 2:00 pm
by frigidmagi
Actually no. Life without Parole means something like 50 years or so. Most prisoners don't live that long.

#10

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:44 am
by The Cleric
frigidmagi wrote:Actually no. Life without Parole means something like 50 years or so. Most prisoners don't live that long.
And if they do, should they get to go free? I say no (and personally, I'd rather be executed than live the rest of my life in jail. Hell, anything over 10 years and I'll take Ol' Sparky).

#11

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:51 am
by frigidmagi
If you've done something that damn bad, I'm in favor of letting you rot in a jail cell until you die in it.

#12

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:35 am
by SirNitram
The Death Penalty is not barbaric, given the precautions involved.

Leaving someone to slowly rot away, mind and soul, with all the dangers of prison, is pretty barbaric.

So it's the logical punishment for barbarians in society.

#13

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:56 am
by The Cleric
Nitram, for once we are in full agreement. It's a mad, mad world...

#14

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:57 pm
by Devonie
And then, of course, you need to add in the fiscal cost of keeping someone in prison vs executing them. It's a lot cheaper to just pull the switch.

#15

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:58 pm
by frigidmagi
And then, of course, you need to add in the fiscal cost of keeping someone in prison vs executing them. It's a lot cheaper to just pull the switch.
Actually it's been proven all costs considered it's cheaper to imprison them for life.

#16

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:42 pm
by LadyTevar
frigidmagi wrote:
And then, of course, you need to add in the fiscal cost of keeping someone in prison vs executing them. It's a lot cheaper to just pull the switch.
Actually it's been proven all costs considered it's cheaper to imprison them for life.
If he's imprisoned, you have put him to work and get some use out of him.

#17

Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:42 pm
by General Havoc
frigidmagi wrote:
And then, of course, you need to add in the fiscal cost of keeping someone in prison vs executing them. It's a lot cheaper to just pull the switch.
Actually it's been proven all costs considered it's cheaper to imprison them for life.
It's been proven that the way we do it, with 20 years of appeals and the like, that it is cheaper to imprison them for life. The Chinese, who basically sentence you to death, then shoot you in the head the next day and charge your family for the bullet, find that execution is very cost-effective.

Not that I'm suggesting that...

#18

Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:38 pm
by frigidmagi
Considering we cannot and will not use the frankly savage and repressive methods of Chinese makes whatever they do irreverent in a discussion about the US Justice system.