Page 1 of 1

#1 Socialized Police -- Threat Or Menace

Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:49 am
by Norseman
I shall post this without comments.
Raymond Speer wrote:There is a specter haunting America, and his name is not Phil. The
Democrat Congress and its presidential heir apparent, Barrack Hussein
Obama, is espousing America's adoption of socialized /police/ even
though that program has ruined every country that ever adopted it.

A radical politician named Robert Peel was the first instigator for that
program in the English speaking world. A uniformed gang of people, paid
handsomely at public expense, supposed to be there to serve and assist
the public. The pretense was that these costumed government employees
---- called police, a word from the /French/ dictionary --- would
apprehend bad guys and would investigate mysteries and discover who done
it.

Back in the Nineteenth Century, social commentator Arthur Conan Doyle
candidly revealed the consequences of Robert Peel's French-flavored
fantasy. In his _Sherlock Holmes_ essays, Doyle showed how right and
justice was only obtainable through hiring a private businessman and
that the /police/ only complicated matters by their laziness, stupidity,
and dedication to job security and inane regulations.

They don't _work_ for justice. To a member of a /police/ organization,
it is their job, so they select the most plausible patsy they can find,
denounce that person as guilty of the crime, close their file on the
case and roll on to other accusations. And it is made worse because
Peelites like Obama prevent the tax-robbed citizen from any effective
legal measures against members of the /police/. Even if you are the
victim repeatedly of crimes, under the Obama system, you have no remedy
against the /police/ for their failure to stake out your property and
protect it. The /police/ posterior is covered when they hand you a slip
of paper on which you write your tragedy. They put your report in
voluminous filing cabinets and spend their day consuming doughnuts and
coffee (that the citizen pays for).

That is government work, perhaps, but it fails to bring any real
accomplishment. By contrast, in America's "pay for services" free
enterprise law enforcement, you get what you pay for. If your bodyguard
is not there to stop someone from mugging you, he is fired on the spot!
If your watchman is not diligently guarding your car, he too is out on
his ass. If your crime scene investigator cannot make a convincing
sppech to the cross-section of the community that you have gathered for
immediate action, then she will not get your assignment the next time
and will be out of business. Our tried and true American system works
so well and so quickly. The aggrieved citizen buys a rope (already
available for under $30 dollars with a pre made hangman's noose for a
wide variety of necks), gathers together friends and neighbors, and
together they punish the perpetrator within a week of the event.
Meanwhile, in Britain's socialized /police/ system, months and years go
by and the crime is not punished. That bureaucratic delay is
intolerable!

John McCain will give taxpayers a rebate of $2500 from their taxes, and
from that, you make your own arrangements freely for service from a
bodyguard and/or private detective when you really need such services.
It is not the Dim-O-Grant plan of flushing dollars into a /police/
rathole and praying the /police/ do more than accuse another innocent
man. It is the American Way, economical and efficient at the same time.

This is just step one in B. Hussein Obama's power grab. Get this --- he
also endorses the program of the infamous pornographer, the Marquis de
Sade, for socialized firefighing --- government employees paid full time
salaries for fighting the occasional fire! Is there any depth to which
that Kenyan Muslim will not stoop?

#2

Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:04 am
by LadyTevar
Ok, this is just horrible satire, but it's not The Onion.

#3

Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:52 am
by Derek Thunder
This is why we can't have nice things.