frigidmagi wrote:Which will drive attending industries under through no fault of their own, great idea.
So what, now it's the government's responsibility to take action to bail out any business that is going to go bankrupt? Because all of them have attending industries that get hurt by their going out of business, including banks. I didn't notice you insisting that Lehman Brothers be saved from Bankruptcy, nor Washington Mutual, nor Indymac, nor Circuit City, nor any of the other major businesses who've gone under, including Chrysler, even though all of them have the same attending industries that got badly hurt. What exactly is so different about GM?
frigidmagi wrote:"Re-organize" in this case by GM's own admission is slash everything to try and satisfy the stock holders.
Re-organize means just that, Frigid. It means re-organize the company so as to permit it to return in some form or another, whether as part of another company, as many smaller companies, or as a re-organized version of itself. It is in no way a matter of liquidating the company to satisfy stock holders. In fact, by law, the stock holders are the ones left holding the bag. I've read GM's bankruptcy plan. It involves shedding unprofitable divisions and focusing capital on profitable ones. It does not involve a Chapter 7 Fire sale.
frigidmagi wrote:There won't be any coming back Havoc. Where are they going to get the capital? From nonlending banks? From faltering competitors? From consumers who aren't buying?
And yes this is a damn rank double standard when GM wants at worse 40 billion and the banks get 2.35 trillion dollars. Bottomless hole my damn ass.
So if they have no resort for money from either banks, competitors, or consumers, how exactly is the company supposed to survive even
with a bailout?
GM has been dying for
forty years due to endemic problems that they manifestly refused to face. Do you actually think a one-time bailout at the 11th hour was going to save them? Or was it going to vanish into the bottomless hole along with all of the rest of the investment money poured into GM over the years, and leave the government as one of the stockholders holding the bag when GM went bankrupt
anyway a few months from now? GM's problems did not emerge overnight. They are not going away because the government threw some one-off money at them.
I fear that you have a
very flawed understanding of what bankruptcy actually involves. It does not mean that the company shuts down overnight and everyone is laid off. Many companies that enter bankruptcy do come back, and the vast majority of those who do not are simply bought in pieces or in full by other companies. Only in a few cases does Bankruptcy result in a Chapter 7 liquidation (as it did with Indymac), and
nobody has been talking about that happening with GM. United Airlines went bankrupt earlier this decade, along with Delta Airlines. Both of them came back, and in fact, both of them
exited bankruptcy and are now operating normally again. Outside the airlines, I could cite Texaco, Conesco, even Worldcom/MCI, as companies that have all made it through bankruptcy (though I'm not sure of Worldcom's status as of right now, the problems there ran very deep).
Plus, the US Government has publicly stated that should GM go bankrupt and produce a reasonable restructuring program (something they have
flatly refused to do, thanks to the dual pressures of their stockholders and the UAW), the US is prepared to take as much as a
50% equity stake in General Motors. That's
well beyond a 40 billion dollar bailout, that's practically Nationalization! The government is prepared to invest up to
FIFTEEN TIMES the amount requested by GM if GM will kindly provide us with some kind of plan to indicate the path they wish to take out of this mess, something they can frankly do easier from within bankruptcy protection than they can without.
What the government will NOT do, is throw 45 billion MORE dollars into GM after the first 15 billion was swallowed up for no alteration. GM has been selling their cars below marginal cost for ten years in an effort to maintain sales figures. General Motors lost 50 billion dollars in 2007 alone, and their sales in 2008 dropped by nearly HALF. It's a bit much to now turn around and claim that GM was killed off by the tight-fistedness of the US government. I would not invest my money in GM right now, given the track record and the complete lack of any meaningful change at work within the corporate structure there. I fail to see why the government should be expected to do any differently, just to postpone an inevitable bankruptcy by another couple of months.
And I really can't believe that we've gotten to the point where
General Motors Corporation, the largest car company in the United States, is supposedly the poor and downtrodden underdog being discriminated against by the evil plutocrats. That's rather like claiming that
Newscorp is a plucky news agency underdog being silenced by an evil conspiracy of media conglomerates...