I'm not surprised the CIA hid programs and operations from Congress. I'm surprised the CIA admitted to it.The head of the CIA has accused former US Vice-President Dick Cheney of concealing an intelligence programme from Congress, a top US senator says.
The existence of the programme, set up after 9/11, was hidden for eight years and its precise nature remains unclear.
Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein confirmed that CIA chief Leon Panetta told Congressional committees he had abandoned the project on hearing of it.
He said that Mr Cheney was behind the secrecy, Sen Feinstein said.
There has been no comment from Mr Cheney.
War of words
'Congress should have been told,' said Sen Feinstein
The California senator, who is chairwoman of the Senate intelligence committee, told Fox News on Sunday that Mr Panetta told her about the programme on 24 June, shortly after hearing about it, and said he had cancelled it.
The Bush administration may have broken the law, Sen Feinstein said, adding that Congress should never be kept in the dark, even though the country was still in shock after the 9/11 attacks.
"This is a big problem," she said.
"I understand the need of the day... but I think you weaken your case when you go outside the law."
But Texas Republican John Cornyn told Fox News that the allegations were part of political moves to distract attention from problems faced by Democrat leaders in Congress.
The claims come amid an increasingly bitter row between the CIA and Congress over whether key information was withheld about other aspects of the agency's operations.
'Capture or kill'
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has claimed that the CIA misled her about interrogation methods including water-boarding, while other senior Democrats have quoted Mr Panetta as admitting that his agency regularly misled Congress before he took office.
Leon Panetta
CIA chief Leon Panetta is said to have closed the programme
Details of the newly-revealed secret programme have still not been divulged.
However, the Wall Street Journal reports that the programme was an attempt to act on a 2001 presidential authorisation issued by President George W Bush to capture or kill al-Qaeda operatives.
Quoting current and former government officials, the newspaper says the CIA spent money on planning and possibly some training.
The New York Times, which broke the story about Mr Cheney's alleged role, also quoted officials as saying the programme was launched by anti-terror operatives at the CIA soon after the 2001 attacks, and involved planning and training but never became fully operational.
Another unnamed official told AP it was an embryonic intelligence-gathering effort, aimed at yielding intelligence that would be used to conduct covert operations abroad.
But the BBC's Kim Ghattas, in Washington, says there is some debate in the intelligence world about how significant the programme actually was.
Regardless of the details, the debate now is about the secrecy that surrounded the programme and whether by concealing it the Bush administration broke the law, our correspondent says.
Veto threat
Mr Panetta - who took over directorship of the CIA under President Obama's administration - is said to have learnt about the programme only on 23 June.
The next day he called an emergency meeting with congressional intelligence committees to tell them about its existence and to say that it was being cancelled.
The allegations come as Democrats in Congress are trying to push through new rules that would increase the number of members of Congress who are told about covert operations.
The White House is threatening to veto the bill, fearing that operational secrecy could be compromised.
The CIA has not commented on the reports of Mr Cheney's role.
"It's not agency practice to discuss what may or may not have been said in a classified briefing," said spokesman Paul Gimigliano.
"When a CIA unit brought this matter to Director Panetta's attention, it was with the recommendation that it be shared appropriately with Congress. That was also his view, and he took swift, decisive action to put it into effect."
A CIA spokesman insisted earlier this week that "it is not the policy or practice of the CIA to mislead Congress".
Cheney 'ordered CIA to hide plan'
Moderator: frigidmagi
- frigidmagi
- Dragon Death-Marine General
- Posts: 14757
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
- 19
- Location: Alone and unafraid
#1 Cheney 'ordered CIA to hide plan'
BBC
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
- Ace Pace
- Antisemetical Semite
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:28 am
- 19
- Location: Cuddling with stress pills
- Contact:
#2
I don't know how much you can blame the CIA here, some things you do want to hide (such as Assasination programs) that you can't take any risk of them leaking. Or that you can't do it legally, but can't expect a spy agency to avoid doing.
[img=left]http://www.libriumarcana.com/Uploads/Ace/acewip7.jpg[/img]Grand Dolphin Conspiracy
The twin cub, the Cyborg dolphin wolf.
Dorsk 81: this is why I support the separation of Aces eyebrow's, something that ugly should never be joined
Mayabird:You see what this place does to us? It's like how Eskimos have their 16 names for snow. We have to precisely define what shafting we're receiving.
"Do we think Israel would be nuts enough to go back into Lebanon with Olmert still in power and calling the shots? They could hook Sharon up to a heart monitor and interpret the blips and bleeps as "yes" and "no" and do better than that, both strategically and emotionally."
The twin cub, the Cyborg dolphin wolf.
Dorsk 81: this is why I support the separation of Aces eyebrow's, something that ugly should never be joined
Mayabird:You see what this place does to us? It's like how Eskimos have their 16 names for snow. We have to precisely define what shafting we're receiving.
"Do we think Israel would be nuts enough to go back into Lebanon with Olmert still in power and calling the shots? They could hook Sharon up to a heart monitor and interpret the blips and bleeps as "yes" and "no" and do better than that, both strategically and emotionally."
- SirNitram
- The All-Seeing Eye
- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
- 19
- Location: Behind you, duh!
- Contact:
#3
I don't buy the assassination program story. Sorry. But far-Right Senators were shocked by this, according to reporting, and they'd not be shocked by 'BTW, we were trying to develop the capacity to assassinate Bin Laden'.
Half-Damned, All Hero.
Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.
I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.
I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
#4
Maybe they were shocked by the utter incompetence of the CIA? The realization that the safety of America is dependent on a bunch of guys who can't find their ass with three GPS unit, a spy satellite, and direct instructions from their Humint operative on the ground right next to them must be very unnerving for them, indeed.
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
#5
Don't forget that time they promoted Wile E. Coyote to Executive Officer.fgalkin wrote:Maybe they were shocked by the utter incompetence of the CIA? The realization that the safety of America is dependent on a bunch of guys who can't find their ass with three GPS unit, a spy satellite, and direct instructions from their Humint operative on the ground right next to them must be very unnerving for them, indeed.
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Who else would have the brilliant plan to assassinate Castro with an exploding cigar?