Page 1 of 1

#1 Tea Party Activists Unveil 'Contract from America'

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:49 pm
by frigidmagi
ABC
Tea Party activists are once again descending on Washington, D.C., and this time they have a 10-point "Contract From America" that they want the next Congress to follow.

"We want them to listen to us," Ryan Hecker, the conservative activist who spearheaded the contract, told ABC News. "We want to restructure our relationship with elected officials. This is a bottom-up, grassroots, transparent effort to call for real economic conservative reform."

The Contract From America, which was produced through an online voting process, will be unveiled officially at a 7:30 p.m. ET "Tax Day" rally taking place on Thursday, April 15 at the Washington Monument.

The preamble to the Contract From America states that it is based on the principles of individual liberty, limited government and economic freedom.

It then enumerates 10 agenda items that it wants congressional candidates to follow. It also lists the vote percentages that each agenda item received in the online balloting that generated the planks:

"(1) Protect the Constitution: Require each bill to identify the specific provision of the Constitution that gives Congress the power to do what the bill does (82.03 percent).

"(2) Reject Cap & Trade: Stop costly new regulations that would increase unemployment, raise consumers prices, and weaken the nation's global competitiveness with virtually no impact on global temperatures (72.20 percent).

"(3) Demand a Balanced Budget: Begin the Constitutional amendment process to require a balanced budget with a two-thirds majority needed for any tax hike. (69.69 percent)

"(4) Enact Fundamental Tax Reform: Adopt a simple and fair single-rate tax system by scrapping the internal revenue code and replacing it with one that is no longer than 4,543 words -- the length of the original Constitution. (64.90 percent).

"(5) Restore Fiscal Responsibility & Constitutionally Limited Government in Washington: Create a Blue Ribbon taskforce that engages in a complete audit of federal agencies and programs, assessing their Constitutionality, and identifying duplication, waste, ineffectiveness, and agencies and programs better left for the states or local authorities, or ripe for wholesale reform or elimination due to our efforts to restore limited government consistent with the U.S. Constitution's meaning. (63.37 percent)

"(6) End Runaway Government Spending: Impose a statutory cap limiting the annual growth in total federal spending to the sum of the inflation rate plus the percentage of population growth. (56.57 percent).

"(7) Defund, Repeal & Replace Government-run Health Care: Defund, repeal and replace the recently passed government-run health care with a system that actually makes health care and insurance more affordable by enabling a competitive, open, and transparent free-market health care and health insurance system that isn't restricted by state boundaries. (56.39 percent).

"(8) Pass an 'All-of-the-Above' Energy Policy: Authorize the exploration of proven energy reserves to reduce our dependence on foreign energy sources from unstable countries and reduce regulatory barriers to all other forms of energy creation, lowering prices and creating competition and jobs. (55.51 percent).

(9) Stop the Pork: Place a moratorium on all earmarks until the budget is balanced, and then require a 2/3 majority to pass any earmark. (55.47 percent).

"(10) Stop the Tax Hikes: Permanently repeal all tax hikes, including those to the income, capital gains and death taxes, currently scheduled to begin in 2011. (53.38 percent)."

One item conspicuously absent from the list is term limits.

Back in February, when ABC News first reported that the contract was in development, Hecker pointed to congressional term limits as the type of proposal that Tea Party activists would likely put in their contract that established politicians would not include in the official Republican Party agenda that is being developed by Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

"It actually didn't make the top 10 in voting," Hecker told ABC News. "It placed 11th. I can't explain why it didn't make it. I'm guessing that it was a more divisive issue than others on the voting list. While my personal top 10 list had term limits, we obviously have to follow the vote."

Hecker said he came up with the contract idea shortly after Barack Obama was elected president in November 2008. Hecker, a 29-year old lawyer from Houston, spent the 2008 GOP primaries working as an opposition researcher for former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign.

To get his idea off the ground, he launched a Web site, "ContractFromAmerica.com," which encouraged activists to offer possible planks for the contract.

From the original 1,000 ideas that were submitted, Hecker whittled it down to about 50 based on popularity. He then narrowed the list down to 21. He was aided in this process by former House Republican Leader Dick Armey, whose conservative group, FreedomWorks, is the sponsor of Thursday's event at the Washington Monument.

The Contract From America, which was inspired by Newt Gingrich's 1994 Contract for America, has Gingrich's backing, and Hecker said he is proud to have it. He noted, however, that the new contract differs from the 1994 contract in that it used online balloting.

"These are principles and ideas every candidate for office should make part of their campaign," Gingrich told ABC News in a statement when asked about the Contract from America. "They are even more powerful because they are generated from the people."

Thursday's unveiling of the Tea Party contract comes at a time when Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, a former national Republican Party chairman who currently chairs the Republican Governors Association, is imploring his fellow Republicans to embrace Tea Party activists.

"How do we win in 2010?" Barbour asked the Southern Republican Leadership Conference over the weekend. "We stick together."

"The Democrats' fondest hope is to see the Tea Party or other conservatives split off and start a third party," Barbour said. "Barack Obama is ... praying for the conservative vote to be split in 2010. We can't let that happen. We've got to stay unified."

The "Contract From America" came under harsh criticism on Wednesday from a Democratic Party spokesman.

"These are bumper sticker slogans -- not a plan," Brad Woodhouse, the communications director of the Democratic National Committee, told ABC News.

"If the Tea Party activists would put aside their rhetoric and rage long enough to look at facts, they would see that the president and Democrats have done more for working families, more to reduce the deficit, more to provide tax relief to average Americans, and more to make government work for the middle class in the past 15 months than Republicans did in eight years," Woodhouse said.

"The energy of Tea Party protesters would be better channeled towards Republicans in Congress who continue to stand with insurance companies, banks and Wall Street lobbyists over American families and small businesses."
I'd like to go through each one and state my position.
(1) Protect the Constitution: Require each bill to identify the specific provision of the Constitution that gives Congress the power to do what the bill does (82.03 percent).
You know what? Sure! You bet! And no whining when the unpleasant surprise comes back that... None of this shit is unconstitutional. You have to stand there and LIKE IT! LIKE IT!
(2) Reject Cap & Trade: Stop costly new regulations that would increase unemployment, raise consumers prices, and weaken the nation's global competitiveness with virtually no impact on global temperatures (72.20 percent).
No. Look this shit is killing people. It's gotta be brought under control. That's all there is to it.
Demand a Balanced Budget: Begin the Constitutional amendment process to require a balanced budget with a two-thirds majority needed for any tax hike. (69.69 percent)
You really think that worked so well for California? Look, you pay now or you pay later. So... No.
(4) Enact Fundamental Tax Reform: Adopt a simple and fair single-rate tax system by scrapping the internal revenue code and replacing it with one that is no longer than 4,543 words -- the length of the original Constitution. (64.90 percent).
What the hell? Look guys I'm up for redoing the tax code. Sure, why not. And I think the Constitution is 7 different flavors of awesome with a super helping of secret kick ass sauce to... But really? The Constitution is the document outlining the sovereign laws of our nation, not a word limit on laws. This is just silly.
5) Restore Fiscal Responsibility & Constitutionally Limited Government in Washington: Create a Blue Ribbon taskforce that engages in a complete audit of federal agencies and programs, assessing their Constitutionality, and identifying duplication, waste, ineffectiveness, and agencies and programs better left for the states or local authorities, or ripe for wholesale reform or elimination due to our efforts to restore limited government consistent with the U.S. Constitution's meaning. (63.37 percent)
Okay, But doesn't the GAO already do this? Also who decides that something is better left to the states? I'm willing to bet me and you have different parameters for that.
(6) End Runaway Government Spending: Impose a statutory cap limiting the annual growth in total federal spending to the sum of the inflation rate plus the percentage of population growth. (56.57 percent).
I will paraphrase our own noble George Washington. I will agree to this if Congress pass a law saying that no problem that could confront the government cost more then this to fix. Ever.
(7) Defund, Repeal & Replace Government-run Health Care: Defund, repeal and replace the recently passed government-run health care with a system that actually makes health care and insurance more affordable by enabling a competitive, open, and transparent free-market health care and health insurance system that isn't restricted by state boundaries. (56.39 percent)
Arrgghhh! That's what our current thing does you manics! You don't even know what you're fighting for or against for the love of God! No!
(8) Pass an 'All-of-the-Above' Energy Policy: Authorize the exploration of proven energy reserves to reduce our dependence on foreign energy sources from unstable countries and reduce regulatory barriers to all other forms of energy creation, lowering prices and creating competition and jobs. (55.51 percent).
This sounds like GobblyGook! No, until you explain in small, single definition words exactly what this means and what we shall do with it.
(9) Stop the Pork: Place a moratorium on all earmarks until the budget is balanced, and then require a 2/3 majority to pass any earmark. (55.47 percent).
Sure, let's fix the budget one percent at a time. Why not.
"(10) Stop the Tax Hikes: Permanently repeal all tax hikes, including those to the income, capital gains and death taxes, currently scheduled to begin in 2011. (53.38 percent)."
Actually I have a different plank. I call it, PAY YOUR MOTHERFUCKING SHARE! In my plank we don't stop taxing you when you pass 300,000$. In my plank you pay something noticable on capital gains and if you get more then 10,000$ in a will, you pay taxes. Look man those F-22's are expensive and I'm not giving them up! You'll all thank me when the Chinese send their armies led by Moses clones across the Pacific against us and the super jets save us all (movie by Micheal Bay with more lens flare!).

I think I answered this with as much seriousness as it deserved.

#2

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:15 pm
by Derek Thunder
Re: Health Care
Arrgghhh! That's what our current thing does you manics! You don't even know what you're fighting for or against for the love of God! No!
I hate to disagree, but they know what they're fighting for (or at least the lobbyists that wrote this list know). Allowing "competition over state lines" is quite simply an attempt to create a race to the bottom as states relax regulation and enforcement to attract insurance companies who will bring desperately-needed tax revenue to the state's coffers. "Competitive, open, and transparent" really just means "deregulate" too. I mean, when you think about it, an invisible hand that absorbs/reflects no light is the very definition of transparent, right?

On the rest, I'll just take on a few for now.
(1) Protect the Constitution: Require each bill to identify the specific provision of the Constitution that gives Congress the power to do what the bill does.
But alas! (link)

"In addition, each report of a committee on a public bill or public joint resolution must contain a statement citing the specific powers granted to Congress in the Constitution to enact the law proposed by the bill or joint resolution."
(4) Enact Fundamental Tax Reform: Adopt a simple and fair single-rate tax system by scrapping the internal revenue code and replacing it with one that is no longer than 4,543 words -- the length of the original Constitution.
"Create a passenger plane that is competitive with other modern designs using no more blueprints or design plans than the Wright Brothers used in 1903."
(8) Pass an 'All-of-the-Above' Energy Policy: Authorize the exploration of proven energy reserves to reduce our dependence on foreign energy sources from unstable countries and reduce regulatory barriers to all other forms of energy creation, lowering prices and creating competition and jobs.
The reason why those miners died in West Virginia was that the market is not free enough. We need less oversight over our coal producers and power generators, and burning cheap, low-quality peat carbon has no negative side effects. Why no, I've never seen a limestone statue melt in the rain, why do you ask?
(10) Stop the Tax Hikes: Permanently repeal all tax hikes, including those to the income, capital gains and death taxes, currently scheduled to begin in 2011.
Combine this with number three and you end up with a situation where the government is completely and utterly unable to respond to emergency situations that require spending. Hurricane devastates another metro area? Major war with another industrial power? Serious pandemic with major casualties? Sorry, our hands are tied.

Basically this seems to amount to a ten-point suicide plan for a nation that's grown tired of living and wants to undergo voluntary Balkanization.

#3

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:32 pm
by frigidmagi
I hate to disagree, but they know what they're fighting for (or at least the lobbyists that wrote this list know). Allowing "competition over state lines" is quite simply an attempt to create a race to the bottom as states relax regulation and enforcement to attract insurance companies who will bring desperately-needed tax revenue to the state's coffers. "Competitive, open, and transparent" really just means "deregulate" too. I mean, when you think about it, an invisible hand that absorbs/reflects no light is the very definition of transparent, right?
You sir, did not read the bloody article. These were submitted in via internet users and voted on by teaparty members. No lobbyist connections, wouldn't be worth their time.

#4

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:26 am
by The Minx
Derek Thunder wrote:Re: Health Care

I hate to disagree, but they know what they're fighting for (or at least the lobbyists that wrote this list know). Allowing "competition over state lines" is quite simply an attempt to create a race to the bottom as states relax regulation and enforcement to attract insurance companies who will bring desperately-needed tax revenue to the state's coffers. "Competitive, open, and transparent" really just means "deregulate" too. I mean, when you think about it, an invisible hand that absorbs/reflects no light is the very definition of transparent, right?
Um, I hate to disagree too, but that's nonsense. :smile:

The idea that insurance companies should be allowed to compete across state lines is one of the few good points these people raise. At present, there are several areas in the US where companies have virtual monopolies. Allowing other companies into such areas will inevitably bring costs down. It's also true that the cost control provisions in Obama's health care law leave a lot to be desired. Competitive, open and transparent means that you change the fundamental reasons for the prices being so high.

This was one of the points the Republicans raised during the health care debate in Congress, and one of the counter-proposals they offered to Obamacare.

#5

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:27 am
by frigidmagi
Expect Minx that's exactly what happened with credit cards. You ever wonder why they're all headquartered together?

#6

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:34 am
by The Minx
Maintaining artificial trade barriers helps keep the prices high, that's all I'm saying.

As for credit cards, I'm not sure what you mean by them being headquartered together. There are 4000 companies in the US with the top ten companies controlling only 2/5 of the market. :???:

#7

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:35 am
by frigidmagi
Look at your next credit card bill, see where the bill is coming from. There's a reason for that. They are all HQed at states where the laws are the laxest.

#8

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:39 am
by The Minx
That's why we have federal laws and a Commerce Clause. :smile: Too bad that's not always used.

But for all that, I don't mind them being headquartered together if it means more options for me.

#9

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:01 am
by frigidmagi
Actually it means less. They're HQed together because they go to the states with the loosest laws. Up til recently they managed to keep the federal government from being involved.

You see a credit card company was bound by the laws of the state it had it's HQ in. So if Maryland has no limits on how much interest a credit company can charge and how often it can change it... Companies move there.

#10

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:05 am
by Derek Thunder
The idea that insurance companies should be allowed to compete across state lines is one of the few good points these people raise. At present, there are several areas in the US where companies have virtual monopolies. Allowing other companies into such areas will inevitably bring costs down. It's also true that the cost control provisions in Obama's health care law leave a lot to be desired. Competitive, open and transparent means that you change the fundamental reasons for the prices being so high.
You're conflating the anti-trust exemption for health care providers for what the Republicans are actually proposing. Lifting the anti-trust exemption (a good thing) means that states can use their powers to break up monopolies and remove barriers to entry for new insurance companies to set up shop in that state. So, in a state with one or two insurance companies, a state would be able to say "okay, you're too big, you need to split into different companies" and so forth.

What the Republicans mean is buying insurance across state lines. Let's say you live in Minnesota, where there's a maximum co-pay of 40% by law (as an example). Currently, any insurance company that wants to sell their services to businesses or individuals in Minnesota has to pay at least 60% of a valid medical bill. Under the proposal to buy across state lines, the insurance company packs up and incorporates in say... Utah, where they only have to pay 10% of a valid medical bill (90% co-pay by the insured). You may end up paying a little less in monthly premiums, but you also might have much higher co-pays, much less protection against recission or rejected claims, or recourse for billing errors. It creates a race to the bottom where insurers merrily skip to the state with the least stringent regulation, then pocket the difference as profit. States facilitate this race by relaxing the laws and/or enforcement, because they need the tax revenue those businesses provide. It's a state of affairs that benefits everyone but the person who's actually receiving insurance.

Frigid mentioned credit cards, there's a reason why they're all incorporated in Delaware or North Dakota - most states have usury laws against excessively high interest rates, but there are a few states that have none. Thus, they all move to those states, and 40% APR becomes a real possibility for consumers.

#11

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:31 am
by The Minx
Obviously, if the feds allow buying across state lines, they also need to provide a proper regulatory framework that prevents abuses like that. Either it's local markets or a national market, you can't have it both ways. That doesn't change the benefit of more options given this caveat.

#12

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:16 am
by SirNitram
Ah, Tea Baggers. 'Contract With America' worked in 1994, so LET'S WRITE OUR OWN. Except in '94 it was clear, obvious laws. This is.. General bitching.

#13

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:00 am
by Cynical Cat
Well the US tax code, from what I understand, should really be rewritten so it doesn't inflict aneurysms on ordinary folks just trying to do their taxes. Also, the IRS should employ humans instead of demons exiled from hell for being too unpleasant.