Russia deploys anti-aircraft missiles in Abkhazia

N&P: Discussion of news headlines and politics.

Moderator: frigidmagi

Post Reply
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
19
Location: Alone and unafraid

#1 Russia deploys anti-aircraft missiles in Abkhazia

Post by frigidmagi »

Yahoo
Russia announced Wednesday that it has moved a sophisticated anti-aircraft missile system into Georgia's breakaway republic of Abkhazia.
The deployment of the S-300s drew immediate protest from Georgia. The Foreign Ministry called it an "extremely dangerous and provocative step that presents a threat not only to the Black Sea region but to European security as a whole."

The U.S. State Department, however, said the missile deployment was old news.

"It is our understanding that Russia has had S-300 missiles in Abkhazia for the last two years," spokesman P.J. Crowley said. "We can't confirm whether they have added to them or not."

Following a brief war against Georgia in two years ago, Russia has steadily increased military ties with Abkhazia and another breakaway Georgian republic, South Ossetia. Earlier this year, both republics agreed to allow Russia to establish military bases on their territory with up to 1,700 troops stationed at each base.

The commander of Russia's air force, Gen. Alexander Zelin, said the S-300s were intended to protect Abkhazia's air space and provide for the security of the republic, Russian news agencies reported. He said a different air defense system has been deployed in South Ossetia.
Zelin did not specify the type of S-300s deployed in Abkhazia. The advanced version is capable of shooting down aircraft, cruise missiles and ballistic missile warheads at ranges of over 90 miles (150 kilometers).
Temur Yakobashvili, the Georgian government minister in charge of issues related to the breakaway republics, said the missile system violated the cease-fire agreement that ended the August 2008 war.


The missiles' deployment was "directed not so much against Georgia as against NATO and the U.S., which intend to place their own missile defense system in Eastern Europe," Yakobashvili told The Associated Press.

The Georgian Foreign Ministry urged the international community to take decisive measures to pressure Russia to stop its "militarization" of the disputed territories and abide by the terms of the cease-fire.
To be honest I doubt the S-300s are aimed at us, but at trying to make Georgia give up. Russia's been pretty constant in it's desire to either reabsorb the place or reduce it to a client state. While I disagree with them, I can understand the desire to ensure that Georgia doesn't become a platform for Russian enemies. Of course they done a wonderful job of making Georgia want to be a platform and have acted pretty much as badly as they accuse the Georgians of doing so.

At this point though Georgia should accept that it isn't getting the break away regions back. None of it's backers care enough to ante up and Georgia itself doesn't have the juice to force the issue. In short the US is to distracted and Europe simply doesn't want anything to do with it.
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
User avatar
fgalkin
Initiate
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 3:10 pm
19
Contact:

#2

Post by fgalkin »

Frigid, I seem to recall than when a certain military alliance decided to put missiles in Cuba, the US shat itself and almost plunged the world into all-out nuclear war. Yet, when Russia is taking steps to prevent that sort of things happening to itself, it is somehow wrong to do so. What changed, and why shouldn't Russia follow the precedent set by the US?

I apologize in advance if I had misinterpreted your post, but it's just a pet peeve of mine.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Last edited by fgalkin on Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
19
Location: Alone and unafraid

#3

Post by frigidmagi »

Yes, you very much have. In fact I'm trying to figure out where you think I'm slamming Russia for not wanting Georgia to be a platform for it's enemies?

Do I disagree with Russia wanting to reconquer Georgia? Well yes. Does that mean I don't think Russia has any business over what happens in Georgia? Of course Russia has business in being concerned there. Georgia is right next door.

I said in my post that the missiles aren't aimed at NATO or the US and neither group really cares. Also I pointed out that Georgia should just accept that the break regions are gone. What do you think I'm saying here?
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
Post Reply