ISS orbit picture

GH: General Discussion

Moderator: LadyTevar

Post Reply
User avatar
The Minx
Pleasure Kitten
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:29 pm
17

#1 ISS orbit picture

Post by The Minx »

I didn't want to spam the new year's thread with more rants about the ISS, but anyway, to illustrate what I was saying there, here's the picture I was talking about:

Image

Doesn't look all that impressive, does it? Especially since the distance to the moon would be over 11000 pixels on this scale.
Last edited by The Minx on Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Batman
The Dark Knight
Posts: 4357
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:47 am
18
Location: The Timmverse, the only place where DC Comics still make a modicum of sense
Contact:

#2

Post by Batman »

Not that the damned thing would be any more useful if it were in geostationary orbit. USED to be people took us having a permanent moon base by now a given and a Mars colony was considered highly likely. Instead, we got... the International Barely Transatmospheric Station.
'I wonder how far the barometer sunk.'-'All der way. Trust me on dis.'
'Go ahead. Bake my quiche'.
'Undead or alive, you're coming with me.'
'Detritus?'-'Yessir?'-'Never go to Klatch'.-'Yessir.'
'Many fine old manuscripts in that place, I believe. Without price, I'm told.'-'Yes, sir. Certainly worthless, sir.'-'Is it possible you misunderstood what I just said, Commander?'
'Can't sing, can't dance, can handle a sword a little'
'Run away, and live to run away another day'-The Rincewind principle
'Hello, inner child. I'm the inner babysitter.'
User avatar
The Minx
Pleasure Kitten
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:29 pm
17

#3

Post by The Minx »

Batman wrote:Not that the damned thing would be any more useful if it were in geostationary orbit. USED to be people took us having a permanent moon base by now a given and a Mars colony was considered highly likely. Instead, we got... the International Barely Transatmospheric Station.
Actually it's not even transatmospheric, since it is well within the thermosphere. It's only beyond the lower atmosphere. To be fair, many satelites are there too. I guess I wouldn't quibble about it if at least it were in the exosphere. Or maybe I'm just venting my disappointment about space flight in general. Yea, that sounds about right.

PS: NASA defines "in space" as being beyond 100 km or so, where the lower atmosphere ends.
Post Reply