#1 Starfleet and the Russian Navy.
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:54 pm
Within Starfleet (via Star Trek just to be clear) we have seen repeated examples of officers being able to pass up promotion without a negative impact on their careers.
These examples include Riker, Picard and Kirk himself.
Now in the Western (or at least Anglo) military tradition, someone who passes up promotion is practically killing their career. There are several reasons for this, one of the biggest is to keep a good movement of new blood and fresh experience into the upper levels, while allowing jr's the chance to get command responsibility. Ensuring there are enough tested and experienced commanders to go around in case the balloon goes up.
This does not seem to be a major motivation in Star Trek, at least not during the TNG era.
Instead commanders and captains are allowed to maintain the same placement and command pretty much for as long as they want it. This echoes in a lot of ways the Russian military tradition where both navy and army officers were allowed to retain commands and posts for as long as they wanted it. The thought being that this allowed for men who knew their area and duties inside and out and had real comfort and experience in the role.
It should be noted this seems to be the route that Starfleet has gone. Riker is allowed to continue as XO for as long as he wants, while Picard and Kirk both turn down promotions to admiral (in fact Spock flat out tells Kirk taking a jump to admiral in ST II was a mistake and a waste of material). This suggest that in the terms of promotion and unit command a more Russian mindset is being used.
Thoughts?
The two systems have never truly be tested in direct confrontation.
These examples include Riker, Picard and Kirk himself.
Now in the Western (or at least Anglo) military tradition, someone who passes up promotion is practically killing their career. There are several reasons for this, one of the biggest is to keep a good movement of new blood and fresh experience into the upper levels, while allowing jr's the chance to get command responsibility. Ensuring there are enough tested and experienced commanders to go around in case the balloon goes up.
This does not seem to be a major motivation in Star Trek, at least not during the TNG era.
Instead commanders and captains are allowed to maintain the same placement and command pretty much for as long as they want it. This echoes in a lot of ways the Russian military tradition where both navy and army officers were allowed to retain commands and posts for as long as they wanted it. The thought being that this allowed for men who knew their area and duties inside and out and had real comfort and experience in the role.
It should be noted this seems to be the route that Starfleet has gone. Riker is allowed to continue as XO for as long as he wants, while Picard and Kirk both turn down promotions to admiral (in fact Spock flat out tells Kirk taking a jump to admiral in ST II was a mistake and a waste of material). This suggest that in the terms of promotion and unit command a more Russian mindset is being used.
Thoughts?
The two systems have never truly be tested in direct confrontation.