Hamas leader killed in air strike

N&P: Discussion of news headlines and politics.

Moderator: frigidmagi

User avatar
Comrade Tortoise
Exemplar
Posts: 4832
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:33 am
19
Location: Land of steers and queers indeed
Contact:

#26

Post by Comrade Tortoise »

Appeals to emotion are all well and good, but they don't make strong arguments. And they withhold aid because aid isn't a right. If they truly do want a change in their circumstance, then they should show at least a little initiative, niu?
What the fuck man? I am trying to find a way that the policy you propose could be more ethically bankrupt, but I just... cant. Save for rounding up palistinian children and putting them in Camps.

Starving children are starving children, and you CANNOT ethically justify the starving of children as a carrot upon which to force people the the negotiating table. All that does is make them desperate and more likely to fight your foreign policy goals. Not only is it monstrous, but it is ineffective.

All you end up doing is increasing suffering in the long run, and short run. Last time I checked you are a utilitarian, you are not being consistent unless you have switched ethical systems since the last time we talked.
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
- Theodosius Dobzhansky

There is no word harsh enough for this. No verbal edge sharp and cold enough to set forth the flaying needed. English is to young and the elder languages of the earth beyond me. ~Frigid

The Holocaust was an Amazing Logistical Achievement~Havoc
User avatar
SirNitram
The All-Seeing Eye
Posts: 5178
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
19
Location: Behind you, duh!
Contact:

#27

Post by SirNitram »

Six Day War: Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser blockaded the Straits of Tiran on May 21st and 22nd to all shipping from and to Eilat; the area was open to Israeli ships under UN supervision since 1957, and Israel repeatedly stated that such a blockade will be considered as casus belli (justification for acts of war).

(Quote from the official Knesset history, Link here)

Present day: How dare they attack us for maintaining a blockade!

Yea, we can totally see how the Israeli argument for this is based on logic and consistancy.
Half-Damned, All Hero.

Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.

I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
User avatar
The Cleric
Thy Kingdom Come...
Posts: 741
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:34 pm
19
Location: The Right Hand Of GOD
Contact:

#28

Post by The Cleric »

Kinda temp post; hashing something out with Ben via AIM.

And Nitram: the blockade is wrong, unless strong evidence can be provided that most of the inbound cargo is munitions and such.
Never shall innocent blood be shed, yet the blood of the wicked shall flow like a river.

The three shall spread their blackened wings and be the vengeful striking hammer of god.
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#29

Post by General Havoc »

This is absolute shit, and everyone here knows it. We've been going on for two pages about Israel having been evil for blockading an area ruled by a known terrorist group who seized control of the area by force in a civil war, whose stated goal is the annihilation of Israel itself, and who dedicates itself first and foremost to firing rockets indiscriminately into Israel. You want to bring up the Straits of Tiran incident? Israel's reaction to the 1967 blockade was to go to war. It was NOT to fire missiles randomly into Cairo with the intention of killing as many Egyptian civilians as humanly possible.

The double standard here makes me sick. You ACKNOWLEDGED half a page ago that Hamas by flinging the missiles into Israel was committing a war crime, but that one doesn't matter.... why exactly? Israel's reaction to it is illegitimate because of.... why exactly? What precisely would you have Israel do? Ignore the missiles?

The blockade of Gaza was instituted because Hamas was firing missiles into Israel. It was considered a step short of war that MIGHT prevent Hamas from being able to do so. It failed, and the missiles continued to fall at a more and more rapid rate. At that point, Israel took what steps any nation on Earth would take to stop them. Perhaps those steps will also fail (I think they will), but do not give me this crap about how Israel is at fault for having missiles shot at them.

I will note at this stage that there are TWO international borders in the Gaza strip, not one. Gaza borders Egypt as well as Israel and the Mediterranean. The Egyptian border with Gaza has been sealed for longer even than the Israeli one, yet I don't hear any of you condemning EGYPT for various high crimes and misdemeanors, even though the Palestinians are often so desperate to get to and from Egypt that they blast holes in the fortifications that separate the two.

I am prepared to accept that Israel has a share of the blame in this latest explosion. I am prepared to accept that the "settlement" movement and the right wingers in Israel have exacerbated this situation. I am prepared to accept many things. What I am not prepared to accept is sitting here listening to a bunch of biased, ignorant nonsense and intellectual fraud, such as the idiodic concept that ISRAEL was the ones who torpedoed the Two-state solution, when that is the exact and precise opposite of truth. There are those within Israel who oppose the two-state solution as there are those within any large country that are fanatical lunatics. But the two-state solution continues to be dismembered by the Palestinians under the guise of whatever group happens to be claiming legitimacy from them in the first place, be it the PLO, Fatah, and yes, even Hamas.

I have yet to hear a single suggestion of practical steps Israel should have taken instead of this incursion. Until I hear some, then all this is, is yet another round of "bash the Israelis because they must have done something to deserve it".
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
Derek Thunder
Disciple
Posts: 562
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:47 pm
16
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Contact:

#30

Post by Derek Thunder »

General Havoc wrote:I will note at this stage that there are TWO international borders in the Gaza strip, not one. Gaza borders Egypt as well as Israel and the Mediterranean. The Egyptian border with Gaza has been sealed for longer even than the Israeli one, yet I don't hear any of you condemning EGYPT for various high crimes and misdemeanors, even though the Palestinians are often so desperate to get to and from Egypt that they blast holes in the fortifications that separate the two.
I'll try to address the rest of your post, there is quite a bit there, but as to this particular point, I've already said that Egypt is useless in this situation. Mubarak is a petty dictator using illiberal means to suppress any alternative political parties, be they social democratic parties or the Islamic Brotherhood. Egypt is in the wrong in this situation as well.
[align=center]Image[/align]
[align=center]"Wikipedia is mankind's greatest invention. You can learn about anything. We all know Ray J. We all know he's a singer. He's Brandy's brother. And he was in that classic sex tape with Kim Kardashian. But, did you also know he's Snoop Dogg's cousin AND he was in the 1996 Tim Burton movie Mars Attacks? Suddenly, you're on the Mars Attacks page!'"[/align]
User avatar
Comrade Tortoise
Exemplar
Posts: 4832
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:33 am
19
Location: Land of steers and queers indeed
Contact:

#31

Post by Comrade Tortoise »

Havoc, have you considered the idea that perhaps both sides are guilty as sin, and that they BOTH willingly participate in a never-ending cycle of violence? Now, I dont think the average Palistinian or Israeli is a monster. But the governments that make policy certainly are. Hamas is a monstrous organization guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity. But so is the state of Israel.

I think that is largely what Derek is getting at. The only reason Hamas can exist is because the people in Palestine literally at this point have nothing to lose. They are in desperate poverty under the grip of a foreign occupier that views them as intrinsically inferior. If you were in that situation you would throw your lot in with islamic fundies too I think.
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
- Theodosius Dobzhansky

There is no word harsh enough for this. No verbal edge sharp and cold enough to set forth the flaying needed. English is to young and the elder languages of the earth beyond me. ~Frigid

The Holocaust was an Amazing Logistical Achievement~Havoc
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#32

Post by General Havoc »

Derek Thunder wrote:I'll try to address the rest of your post, there is quite a bit there, but as to this particular point, I've already said that Egypt is useless in this situation. Mubarak is a petty dictator using illiberal means to suppress any alternative political parties, be they social democratic parties or the Islamic Brotherhood. Egypt is in the wrong in this situation as well.
Well I certainly have to agree that Egypt is an illiberal dictatorship that suppresses other political parties, but in the case of Hamas and Gaza, there is more to it than that. The Egyptians used to run Gaza after all, but they worry that the long-term Israeli strategy is to force them to continue to administer it, and given Hamas' ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, I can see why they'd be afraid.

Now, I'm not trying to defend their actions of simply sealing the border shut and washing their hands, but there is a reason Hamas is considered a terrorist organization by more than just the US. Egypt is worried that Hamas is going to turn their sights on Egypt's (admittedly illegitimate and dictatorial) government, and will do everything they can to avoid that. It's not simply gut-reaction hostility to any random form of political activity. Hamas is not a Social Democratic organization, they are a violent, militant, fundamentalist terror organization. Sight should not be lost of that fact.

But you're right about Egypt's role in all this as being "useless". I can think of no better term for it.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#33

Post by General Havoc »

Comrade Tortoise wrote:Havoc, have you considered the idea that perhaps both sides are guilty as sin, and that they BOTH willingly participate in a never-ending cycle of violence? Now, I dont think the average Palistinian or Israeli is a monster. But the governments that make policy certainly are. Hamas is a monstrous organization guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity. But so is the state of Israel.
Surely you are not actually trying to equate an organization such as Hamas with a democratic government elected by its own people that is under rocket attack and facing ever-louder public outcry demanding that action be taken to stop it. Surely you are not actually simplistically claiming "a pox on both their houses" in a case such as this. That is like claiming that because US troops did commit crimes against Japanese soldiers during the Pacific Theatre of World War II, that Japan and the United States had equal moral culpability for the horrors of that war. That statement is absurd on its face.

I will accept that the Israelis, especially certain factions of the Israeli populace, are culpable for what has happened here. What I will not accept is that Israel is a monstrous organization on the same level as Hamas. Israel has not dedicated itself to the extinction of the Arab peoples. Israel does not randomly lob rockets into civilian areas for the purpose of causing a maximum number of civilian casualties. Israel has not attempted to send car bombs and suicide bombers into Palestine for the purpose of murdering as many people as they could. Israel did not attempt to militarily conquer Jordan or Syria or Egypt for the stated purpose of killing every living thing residing there, as every one of those countries has at one time done, and as Hamas continues to claim they want to do. When Israel has invaded those countries (and they have, each of them, at times), it has been in response to attacks or provocations, and whether or not those attacks have been legitimate (some were and some were not), they were not stated attempts at Genocide, and generally were concluded within a matter of days, once the threat had been resolved (the Lebanon thing in the 80s is the one major exception). That is not the same thing as declaring total war against a nation into perpetuity and attempting to kill everything in it.

You can of course argue that Israel is not in a position where it NEEDS to do these things, that they have a strategic position that does not render it necessary, and that that is the reason they do what they do, but let us not forget that it is Hamas, not Israel that exists for the purpose of committing murder. There have been war crimes committed by Israel. I know of several. There have been enough accusations of massacre by Israeli troops that I believe that some of them must be true. There are elements within Israel which are fanatical and bloodthirsty and who wish to conquer the West Bank and rule "Greater Israel".

But Hamas is comprised OF those elements.

A few months ago, in Haifa (I think), there were riots by Jewish Israelis in which terrible crimes were committed against Arabs who lived in the city. I don't think those crimes extended to murder, but they may have. The perpetrators of those crimes were (in most cases) arrested and charged with the crimes they had committed. Let us compare that to Hamas, whose entire organization is dedicated to the commission of as many of those sorts of acts as they can humanly accomplish. There are a million (roughly) Arabs living in Israel as Israeli citizens, though I have no doubt they are suffering illegal discrimination that would make any American riot. Yet they do live there. They have representatives in the Knesset. They are neither murdered wholesale nor driven out at bayonet-point. Do you actually think that the same would be true of a Jew living in the Gaza Strip?

I'll give you another example, and forgive me if I'm sparing on the details, as I don't have them on-hand. I can do the research if you wish further details.. A group of Israeli fanatics, I think from the settler's lobby, but I'm not sure, decided to commit a terrible atrocity. They loaded a van full of explosives and planned to detonate it in front of an Arab girls' school, I believe within Israel itself (again, not totally sure). Fortunately they were caught, en-route to the school itself, by Israeli police. They were tried, convicted, and sentenced to 30 years in jail, each. That is how Israel deals with such acts, indeed that is also how all civilized nations deal with such acts, including Arab and Muslim ones. Hamas, on the other hand, instigates them, wherever and whenever possible.

Do not give me this nonsense about how Israel and Hamas are equally evil. That statement is absurd on its head.
They are in desperate poverty under the grip of a foreign occupier that views them as intrinsically inferior.
Israel occupies neither the West Bank, nor Gaza, a fact which should be obvious from the fact that this entire fight began due to dozens of rockets being flung at Israel from Gaza. At the end of this fight, I do not know what will be occupied by who, but at present, the Palestinians are not being occupied by Israel. They are being occupied by a fanatical terrorist organization that sees their poverty as a convenient means to draw more fighters for a neverending Jihad against the hated Jews.

There is perhaps no more oppressed people in the world than the Palestinians, and the terrible poverty, hopelessness, and grinding bloodshed they suffer draws the pity of the world, as it should. And some of the blame for that is rightly Israel's. But far more of it belongs to Hamas, to the PLO, to Fatah, and to the other Arab nations who have all thrown their hands up and declared the Palestinians to be an "Israeli problem". To compare Israel to Hamas and claim they are both equally morally bankrupt is just disgusting.
Last edited by General Havoc on Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:45 am, edited 2 times in total.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#34

Post by General Havoc »

Look, I'm... not trying to be as belligerent as I think I'm sounding here, and I'm sorry if I am coming across that way. I know most people are sympathetic towards the plight of the Palestinians, I am too. It just frustrates me to no end to see this sort of fight keep happening, and every single time, the reasons behind it are mis-interpreted or lost beneath a cloud of mutual recriminations. Until they rid themselves of Hamas and their ilk by one means or another, the Palestinian people are never going to be able to create a real nation for themselves, whether or not Israel is as evil as we are saying. I understand that "ridding yourself" of Hamas is no easy prospect, perhaps even impossible, and yet the fact remains. Whatever you think of Israel's moral culpability, Hamas unilaterally declared the truce would not be renewed, and then punctuated that claim by quadrupling the number of rockets they were firing into Southern Israel. You can say they had reasons to do it and you can say that didn't, but everyone has to at least agree that a reaction like this was inevitable once they decided to do so. Perhaps Israel is guilty as sin, and perhaps they are blameless as saints, but either way, once the rockets began to deluge southern Israel, there was simply no other way for this to end.

Like I said last time this sort of thing flared up, it's just another day in the Middle East...
Last edited by General Havoc on Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
SirNitram
The All-Seeing Eye
Posts: 5178
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
19
Location: Behind you, duh!
Contact:

#35

Post by SirNitram »

Havoc, before you go on about 'democratically elected government' being better than Hamas, please remember that Hamas was elected into it's present position.

Holding 'Democracy' up like some kind of beacon of morality is part of this problem. The insistance on open and free elections by the Bush Administrations led to two options for the Palestinians: The outrageously corrupt and useless present, or the folks who had built schools, built homes, and so forth.

So yes. It is fine to compare Hamas to a democratically elected government. It is one now. Thank you, for this committment to democracy, damn the costs. You probably weren't aware of this, admittably. The media and government are just a touch slanted.

As for outrage over attacking civilians.. The Civil War was a while ago. The Israelis are certainly killing civilians. Oh, yes, they dropped leaflets telling people to get out. Small logical problem:

Gaza is still in lockdown. The regular folks, without the ties, have no where to run.
Half-Damned, All Hero.

Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.

I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#36

Post by General Havoc »

I have bad news to break to you Nitram. Hamas was not elected to its present position.

Yes, I know what you're about to say, that they won the legislative elections in 2006. And so they did. But they then launched a civil war against (or more accurately, Fatah and Hamas launched one against each other) that resulting in them seizing unilateral power in Gaza by force of arms. They shot everyone from parties opposed to them, seized humanitarian aid supplies because they were being delivered to Fatah organizations, tortured dissidents and cracked down on the press in Gaza. All of these actions were extremely well documented by western and Arabic media sources. And incidentally, if you'll read what I said, I did not claim Israel was better than Hamas solely because they were a democratic regime. I claimed they were better than Hamas because they are not an organization dedicated utterly to the slaughter of entire peoples.

Don't believe me? Here are quotes from Hamas' founding charter:
You may speak as much as you want about regional and world wars. They [The Jews] were behind World War I, when they were able to destroy the Islamic Caliphate, making financial gains and controlling resources. They obtained the Balfour Declaration, formed the League of Nations through which they could rule the world. They were behind World War II, through which they made huge financial gains by trading in armaments, and paved the way for the establishment of their state. It was they who instigated the replacement of the League of Nations with the United Nations and the Security Council to enable them to rule the world through them. There is no war going on anywhere, without having their finger in it.

- Article 22, Hamas Charter
"The Day of Judgment will not come about until Muslims kill all the Jews, when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdul-la, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad [Cedar] tree, would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews.""

- Article 7, Hamas Charter
Israel HAS killed Palestinian civilians, and Hamas has killed Israeli civilians. The difference is that Hamas is trying its best to kill Israeli civilians in whatever number they can. If you don't believe me, go listen to them. They admit it freely. Israel on the other hand is trying to stop rocket fire from pouring into their country. In the course of their operations they have killed civilians. I do not know if they did so because they took insufficient care to avoid it, or because they physically could not avoid it. In either case however, they are not "equally morally culpable".

During the height of WWII, the British were attempting to bomb the launcher sites from which V1 rockets were being fired into London. In the course of this action, they did kill civilians, sometimes even non-German civilians, when bombs fell off course or when they were unable to precisely hit the target. Does this make Britain equally morally guilty to Germany?

Hamas was elected to a plurality (NOT a majority) in the Palestinian parliament because they were seen (and probably rightly so) as being much less corrupt and more concerned with the welfare of the Palestinian people than Fatah was. They were NOT however elected to suppress all of the other parties and seize control of Gaza by armed force. Nor were they elected to fire rockets into Israel and seize food aid going to anyone who was not their supporters. And even if they HAD been elected to do these things, that doesn't change the fundamental facts on the ground of who is doing what and for what reason.

Israel has a fundamental right to do what it must do to stop rockets from pouring into its country. Every nation on earth would do the exact same thing that they are doing. And yet because it's Israel, the old double-standard has to be dredged up about the evil bloodthirsty Jews raping and pillaging. Seriously though, if Mexican rebels were flinging rockets into San Diego because our "occupation" of California was illegitimate (there are arguments to be made), and the Mexican government fully supported these actions and did everything it could to increase the pace of rocket fire, regardless of truces or international agreements, what precisely would you suggest the US do about it?
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
SirNitram
The All-Seeing Eye
Posts: 5178
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
19
Location: Behind you, duh!
Contact:

#37

Post by SirNitram »

So... Hamas was not elected to do bad things.. Therefore all bad things they do invalidate the election.

Where's that come from?
Half-Damned, All Hero.

Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.

I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#38

Post by General Havoc »

No, the bad things they do makes them bad people. It does not invalidate their election. They were elected to a plurality of seats in parliament, and whether or not they are bad people doesn't change that. What does change their legitimacy is the fact that they then embarked on a civil war to seize total control over Gaza and shot everyone within the Palestinian groups that was in any way in opposition to them.

Now... I'll admit, I don't know what went down between Fatah and Hamas last year very well. I'm willing to believe that Fatah started shit, or provoked it, as they're no more committed to democracy than Hamas is. The point is they did not win an election for the position of despotic ruler of the Palestinian people, they won a plurality in the parliament. If the Democratic party in the US (who just won a major plurality themselves) were to then execute every member of the Republican party that they could lay their hands on, they would also have lost the legitimacy they had acquired in doing this thing.

But no, the bad things they do does not invalidate their election. It just makes them bad people.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
SirNitram
The All-Seeing Eye
Posts: 5178
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
19
Location: Behind you, duh!
Contact:

#39

Post by SirNitram »

I would say you should re-consider that statement. Because it leads to the idea that the departing administration of the US, by bypassing the traditional and legal bounds of control, was not merely atrociously bad, but illegitimate.

Unfortunately, I doubt the consideration and reasoned responses we exchange here are going to encourage consideration and reason in the war.

Link
GAZA, Dec 23 (Reuters) - Hamas would consider renewing a lapsed truce with Israel in the Gaza Strip, but wants guarantees the Jewish state will halt incursions and keep border crossings open for supplies of aid and fuel, a spokesman said on Tuesday.

Gaza's Islamist leaders had initially ruled out extending the six-month-old, Egyptian-brokered truce, which they declared dead last Friday. Palestinian militants stepped up cross-border rocket fire, ratcheting up tensions with Israel.

But spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said Hamas and other Gaza factions were now prepared to study offers to renew the accord.

Israel's closure of the crossings has increased hardships in the coastal enclave, home to 1.5 million people, forcing the main power plant to shut down and international aid agencies to temporarily halt food distribution.

Hamas's apparent shift came two days before scheduled talks in Cairo between Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, a top candidate to succeed Ehud Olmert as prime minister in next February's election.

It also followed an agreement between Hamas and the Islamic Jihad militant group to temporarily curb rocket attacks at the urging of the Egyptians. In the last 48 hours, the Israeli army said five rockets and a mortar shell were fired at Israel, a significant reduction from the dozens launched over the weekend.

Egyptian officials provided few details about what might be discussed on Thursday. "The Egyptians want to raise the whole question of the truce and to prevent Israel from invading Gaza," said one Israeli official.

DON'T LOOK WEAK

Aides to Olmert have said Israel was prepared to meet its commitments under the ceasefire, but only if Hamas imposed the ceasefire on all of Gaza's militant factions.

And it was unclear whether Israel would agree to guarantees to open the border since that could limit its options in future.

Israel blamed Hamas for the collapse of the truce, saying the crossings were frequently closed in response to rocket attacks -- which usually cause little damage -- and other threats.

But both Israel and Hamas have sent mixed messages about their intentions, trying to avoid another flare-up without appearing weak.

Though Israeli defence officials had threatened to start targeting a wider-range of Hamas targets in the Gaza Strip, both Olmert and Defence Minister Ehud Barak have been cool to calls from some hawks for a large-scale ground offensive.

Such an operation could result in heavy casualties on both sides, fuel a major humanitarian crisis and spark an international outcry against Israel.

Likewise, Barhoum, while holding out hope of renewing the truce, derided Israeli talk of an extension as misinformation aimed at "throwing dust in our eyes".

"The region is heading towards an escalation, not calm," Barhoum said.

In a warning to Israeli leaders who may be contemplating a major offensive, Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Zahar said: "If they enter, we will inflict losses upon them and will teach them a lesson they will never forget."

Livni has vowed to make toppling Hamas a top priority for her government if she gets elected on Feb. 10. Her main rival for the premiership, right-wing Likud party leader Benjamin Netanyahu, has made a similar pledge.

Barak has dismissed such sabre-rattling, saying even a massive incursion may not stop the rockets. (Writing by Adam Entous; Editing by Katie Nguyen)
The leaders who decided not to extend the truce were total dipshits, but holy shit. 'Teach them a lesson'. And the return of Codpeice Size Policy. Teenaged machismo-induced swagger is not policy grounded in reality.
Half-Damned, All Hero.

Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.

I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#40

Post by General Havoc »

Bad as the Bush administration's abuses of law have been, they have not been on the scale of what Hamas did, though in fairness what Hamas did is no different than what most Middle Eastern political organizations try to do when they take power. Bush did not assassinate every Democrat in Washington, nor even some of them. Such things would have illegitimated (is that a word?) his government.

To be honest, I have no faith that anything is going to encourage consideration and reason in this war. Neither participant wants to be reasonable at this stage. This "Teach them a lesson" stuff is regrettable, but it's no surprise to me. Hamas has always issued statements like that.

This thing's just gonna have to burn itself out.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
SirNitram
The All-Seeing Eye
Posts: 5178
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
19
Location: Behind you, duh!
Contact:

#41

Post by SirNitram »

It's Israel issuing the 'Teach Them A Lesson' statement this time.

But really, at this point in the cycle, such distinction falls away. It's reaching into 'They killed my brother so I must kill them' territory, which is cyclic.
Half-Damned, All Hero.

Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.

I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#42

Post by General Havoc »

Er... I might be reading it wrong, but according to the thing you posted above, the "Teach them a lesson" line was from Mahmoud al-Zahar, a Hamas commander. At this stage though, you're right. Both sides intend to "teach" one another a lesson.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
SirNitram
The All-Seeing Eye
Posts: 5178
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
19
Location: Behind you, duh!
Contact:

#43

Post by SirNitram »

General Havoc wrote:Er... I might be reading it wrong, but according to the thing you posted above, the "Teach them a lesson" line was from Mahmoud al-Zahar, a Hamas commander. At this stage though, you're right. Both sides intend to "teach" one another a lesson.
You're correct, I read it wrong before I posted.

Here's the big concern, though. Let's assume that all this dick-waving from Israel works. Who fills the power vacuum? There's alot of full-on psycho groups.
Half-Damned, All Hero.

Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.

I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#44

Post by General Havoc »

Well to begin with, this dick-waving from Israel won't work. I'm sure they'll do better than they did in 2006, but only somewhat. Hamas cannot be destroyed in the manner they are trying to destroy it, any more than Hezbollah could. I believe Israel's stated goals are to destroy the capacity for Hamas to fire rockets into Israel. I don't know if that will work either. Honestly, I doubt it.

But to answer your question, should somehow they manage to destroy Hamas, some other radical group will fill the vacuum. Perhaps another splinter of the Islamic Brotherhood. Perhaps something else. Who knows...
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
The Minx
Pleasure Kitten
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:29 pm
17

#45

Post by The Minx »

The only way they could make Israel safe from rocket attacks using ground forces like this is if they use the IDF to form a Hamas-free defensive buffer wide enough so the rockets don't have adequate range to get into Israel proper. Only that's a little difficult with one and a half million people there who need to be policed. This only fuels additional violence - trite, perhaps, but all too true.
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
19
Location: Alone and unafraid

#46

Post by frigidmagi »

The only way they could make Israel safe from rocket attacks using ground forces like this is if they use the IDF to form a Hamas-free defensive buffer wide enough so the rockets don't have adequate range to get into Israel proper.
Given modern ranges Minx this would require invasions into neighboring nations. Like Syria, Lebanon and Egypt. I trust we all can agree that at the moment that would be a bad idea.
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
Post Reply