The split of young evangicals in 2008.

N&P: Discussion of news headlines and politics.

Moderator: frigidmagi

Post Reply
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
19
Location: Alone and unafraid

#1 The split of young evangicals in 2008.

Post by frigidmagi »

newsweek
V.Doug Paul was born in July 1981 in Richmond, Va.—demographics that make his birth, in a sense, historic. He was born, six months after Ronald Reagan's inauguration, to conservative Christian parents who knew for the first time the thrill of voting for a candidate who represented their values, Christian values. Graduates of Oral Roberts University, Gregg and Glenda Paul had thrown themselves into the Reagan campaign, canvassing and making calls. "I liked the direction he was going. I liked his ability to communicate," remembers Gregg. "I liked that he was very much pro-life, less government." When Reagan won, the Pauls felt they had contributed to his landslide.

In Doug's childhood home, a prayer was said over every meal. The family went to church so frequently that Doug imagined it was never closed. He didn't knowingly hear a secular pop song until he was in the ninth grade:
he thought Michael Jackson was a Christian singer. His life and values were shaped by what his parents and pastors taught him about the Bible: Scripture was the divine word of God and clearly sorted righteous acts from sinful ones. Doug grew up not just believing, but knowing that abortion and homosexuality were wrong. It went without saying: when he grew up, he would vote Republican.

In 2008, another historic wave swept the country, and this time Doug Paul was no longer a child. He voted—against his parents, against his pastors, against his history—for Barack Obama. More wrenching, he left the church in which he was born, baptized and married to start his own congregation. His mother, especially, remains bewildered by his choices. "My big question," she says, sitting on a landing in her suburban house, "is why do you think this way?"

"It's hard," says Paul in a separate conversation, "because you want the people you love to understand and to validate what you think is right—and that doesn't always happen."

So much has been written about the Joshua Generation, the young white evangelical Christians who pundits predicted would usher Obama into office in overwhelming numbers. Following such high-profile do-gooders as Rick Warren and Bono, moved to action by global poverty and environmental decay, these Christians were supposed to turn away from their parents' obsession with abortion and gay marriage and pull the lever for Obama. The truth, as always, is a lot more complicated. Young Christians liked Obama much better than Kerry: a third of white evangelicals ages 18 to 29 voted Democratic this time, compared with 16 percent in 2004. Still, a third is hardly a majority. And their grandparents liked Obama less: a quarter voted for him, compared with a third for Kerry. On the whole, Christians shifted negligibly to the left: 24 percent of them voted Democratic, compared to 21 percent in 2004. Exit-poll data then demonstrate not a political sea change among evangelicals—who remain more socially conservative than most other religious groups, especially on abortion— but painful generational divisions within their ranks. Disagreements revolve around priorities: how best to express Christian values in a fast-changing world.

Obama fought more aggressively than John McCain for every centrist vote—especially in contested states like Virginia—and in the end succeeded in capturing enough of the Joshua Generation to make his win decisive. But behind each evangelical vote is a story like Paul's: a young person, wrestling with culture and conscience, hoping in the end that hope will prevail, aware that friends and relatives will see the choice as a betrayal. The gravity of Paul's choices, he says, "has caused some pain for me, but a lot of redemption as well. It was a breaking from what I had always known, a moving into unfamiliar territory."

Doug Paul struck out into unfamiliar territory during high school, after he read Joseph Conrad's "Heart of Darkness." The fatalism of that novella, its hopelessness about human redemption, made Paul question the value of Christian worship. With such doubts in his mind, he went on to Wheaton College in Illinois, the alma mater of the evangelist Billy Graham. There he met other Christians like him—questioning, politically engaged news junkies who confessed to each other that they were confused about God. "I basically became a functioning atheist," Paul says. "I hit reset, bulldozed my childhood education and started new." (Located in DuPage County, Wheaton exemplifies the kind of community that flipped for Obama. In 2004, Bush won DuPage by nearly 40,000 votes; in 2008, Obama won by 50,000.) In 2003, Paul was forced to leave Wheaton in disgrace. He had cheated his boss, for whom he worked summers selling books door-to-door, out of thousands of dollars by lying about his sales figures. (He eventually repaid his debt.) Infuriated, his parents yanked his tuition and allowed him to come back home on the condition that he return to church.

Southside Nazarene is not the most inviting of structures: it resembles a sports complex more than a place for intimate communion. But its senior pastor, Jerome Hancock, welcomed Paul home, invited him back to church and guided him on the path to ministry. In 2004, Paul founded a study group for 20-somethings. The next year he started a ministry called Ephesus, which offered a perspective Paul felt was lacking at Southside: a broader reading of the Bible and a practical discussion of social-justice issues including poverty and human rights. "We weren't talking about abortion every week," says Paul.

For Paul, as for so many evangelicals of his generation, the issue of gay rights drove a wedge in the already-widening gap between his elders and himself. According to the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, 26 percent of white evangelicals ages 18 to 29 support gay marriage, compared with 9 percent of white evangelicals older than 30. In 2006, as Virginia was preparing to vote on an amendment banning gay marriage, Southside Nazarene posted a sign near the road urging people to vote yes. SAVE OUR FAMILIES was emblazoned on the banner. Doug Paul remembers a particular Friday-night dinner with his parents that ended in silent fuming. He and his new wife, Elizabeth, were expecting a houseguest that weekend who was gay, and he expressed irritation that their church would propagate the idea that gay people preyed on children.

"I'm pretty sure I just burst out during the meal," he remembers. "I was like, 'Does this really make people feel welcome? Would we put up a sign that says SAVE US FROM ANGRY PEOPLE, or whatever other people we say have sinned?' " The table fell silent. "You could hear the clink of ice cubes in our glasses," he says. His parents say they don't remember the incident.

Paul credits Obama's campaign slogan—"Be the change you seek"—with helping him realize his dream of starting his own congregation. He prayed on the decision for months, going weekly to the driving range to think. He found the theology at Southside too punitive, its social outreach too limited. He and his peers were still pro-life, he explains, but tired of the narrow lens through which his pastors viewed the world. (On abortion, according to the same Pew study, under-29s remain as conservative as their parents: more than 70 percent believe it should be illegal in most or all cases.) Paul prayed for a "return to the Christian tradition that existed before Roe v. Wade," he said. "It's because I'm pro-life that I have to talk about poverty, clean water, AIDS, the environment. [It would be] paradoxical to talk about giving a voice to the oppressed and not to care about people who are actually born." In February he told his mentor, Pastor Jerome, that he would be leaving the church. In March he started Eikon Community, taking a dozen former Ephesus members with him. Today, he preaches to about 40 people each Sunday in a one-room church on a busy strip.

One of these is D.J. Glisson, a 27-year-old graphic designer who signed his absentee ballot for Obama in the presence of his 10-member prayer group. Unlike Doug Paul, who voted for Kerry in 2004, Glisson had never voted for a Democrat before. Raised in a conservative suburb of Richmond, Glisson went to a Christian college and voted for George W. Bush—twice. But Obama's speech on race resonated with Glisson's own view that there are many paths to God, and Obama's position on abortion—legal but infrequent—made moral sense. As he signed his ballot he thought, Wow, things have changed a little bit. He now avoids politics as a survival tactic at family functions. "If it's not going to open minds," he says, "I'm not going to bother."

Pastor Jerome and Doug Paul haven't spoken since Paul announced his departure—though both insist the silence is unintentional. Jerome expresses dismay that the Eikon congregation has moved so far from his church's fundamental teachings, that many drink alcohol, for example, and are willing to vote for a pro-choice candidate. "My faith in God creates a certain logical base," he says. "Does killing a baby make sense? No. Does homosexual marriage make sense? No." He compares Paul's defection to a childish rebellion and expresses conviction that maturity will bring the young man back toward conservative values. With this analysis, Hancock, who is 59, fails to consider a critical fact. He was young and idealistic once, too.
I feel like I have alot in common with Doug Paul, despite never having met him.

I was born in November of 1980, only days after the election. My parents who were registered Democrats (as one might guess the 60s and 70s created a strong Democrat holding in deaf communities) voted Republican for the first time in their lives (they were both in their 30s). They did so because Reagan spoke to them as Christians.

Like Doug I grew up in the church. My father was a pastor for most of my life. Ironically watching the struggles and hardship he endured for his ministry only cemented an iron determination to never be a pastor unless God himself came down and ordered it. It's just as well. No one would really want to hear what I have to say.

I voted for Bush in 2000. I was stationed in Okinawa at the time. Part of the 3rd FSSG, 9th ESB, 1st Company, Marines. My upbringing and faith was part of the vote. To be blunt to my secular friends. My faith will always be part of my political reasoning process. It is not a cheap jacket that I can put on and take off as is convient. It is as part a part of me as my arms and legs. It wasn't the only driving reason though. As one Marine put it "voting for Gore would be like voting for Clinton all over again" Clinton was and is not popular among either young Marines or young Christians. I was both.

When 2004 came, I was still a Christian and a Marine although honorably discharged. I voted for Kerry. Again faith was part of the reason. Bush was behaving in a manner that I could no longer really support and I had felt deeply betrayed by what I saw (and still do) as willful incompetence and neglect towards the war. I had served in Iraq, friends had served in Afghanistan. The government was doing well in... neither. My sister who was always more left winged then me voted Kerry as well. So did my mother. My brother absolutely refused to vote feeling both men to be morally repugnant and utterly useless. I think he was right in his belief, if not in his actions.

I found out about Obama towards the end of 2007. Silence and Dark Silver can tell you about me championing him as early as January 2008. At first I liked McCain, my vote was nothing personal just business. I felt Obama to be the better choice even if I disagreed with him about a number of things. I thought McCain was a good man, just... wrong. The more I learned though, the less I liked him. McCain would make several motions in order to court Christian voters. The more I learned about his private life the more those motions seemed like empty cynical attempts to pad his voter count. This is a man who left his wife on her hospital bed after a car wreck to marry his mistress. He has never really honestly expressed remorse about that. If he had admitted to it, and honestly said that he had been in the wrong, that he had sinned in cheating on his wife and on dropping her like an old coat because she picked up some scars, it might be different. But he didn't. So I can only laugh darkly at remarks my some declaring they think he's the more moral man. It keeps me from crying.

I voted for Obama because he was... well right. I voted for him because he was able to speak to as a Christian and it is to his everlasting credit that he didn't exclude others from the conservation as well, which only made me even more sure. I didn't vote for Obama in spite of my faith but because of it. That sentence holds true for Doug and D.J as well.

I don't care for abortion. I find it unnecessary at best and vaguely disgusting at worse. For me it's such an avoidable tragedy that it boggles the mind that it ever happens. However, I cannot and will not support any attempt to render it illegal. It would be madness to do so, especially in light of other actions of my elders, ensuring that there will be a demand. It is an avoidable tragedy but for many young women, the conservatives have thrown up road blocks on the other paths.

I do support gay marriage. Not civil unions, the full bit. I do believe that a pastor should have the right to say no he won't do it, but the law should also allow pastors who will do it the right to and the ceremony should count for as much under the law as any other. I didn't always feel this way. But the facts leave me no other stand I can take in good faith. A homosexual has no choice in his or her orientation. Sin is a choice. The Old Testament Law, which Jesus, Peter and Paul all declared to be over with and done anyways is wrong. Whatever else you believe Gays are also human beings. It is morally wrong to treat them as less, which is what we do with these laws.

I do not view these stands as being in conflict. Nor do I or others take them in spite of our faith, belief or childhood teachings we do it because of them. 2008 was not an end, or a middle, it was a beginning. A shooting match is developing between those who hold to Reagan and those who can no longer do so. One side may be in megachurches with starbucks attached. The other may be crammed in one room hotels or starting from someone's home. But such are beginnings. Christ started in less, or so the story goes.
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
User avatar
LadyTevar
Pleasure Kitten Foreman
Posts: 13197
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:25 pm
18
Location: In your lap, purring
Contact:

#2

Post by LadyTevar »

Well said, Frigid.

In the 80s, I saw a lot of what I termed 'hypocrisy' in the church. The Bible Lessons I was being taught did not fit with what I was seeing happening in the adults or the children of the church. There was no forgiveness, no love towards fellow man, no giving of themselves to help others.

I've been a cynic about organized religion ever since, although I still feel myself to be Christian.
I'm just not a very good one, and I admit it. :wink:

There are a lot of churches that have gone so far right and so far away from what they teach, such a backlash by the 20-30-somethings is inevitable. There is a huge disconnect between myself and my mother. There is a large disconnect between her and her pastor, who uses video recordings as a backdrop to his (very fundie-leaning) sermons.
Instead of the more general fire-and-brimstone sermons of her youth, it's now more focused on gays and other right-wing talking points. Now, it's not just everyone who's a sinner and in need of help. Now, it's we're sinners, but THESE people are Beyond Saving.

Yes, I've been to a few of his sermons. Yes, the quiet undertones of his sermons made me feel he was saying Gays and those who have Abortions are beyond saving. In the past sermons of the 70s-80s, NO ONE was beyond saving, as long as they listened and believed in Christ's Love.

And that, I think, is the whole problem with the Religious Right. They started preaching that some can't be Saved, didn't deserve to BE Saved. They stopped preaching forgiveness and only preach hatred.
Image

Dogs are Man's Best Friend
Cats are Man's Adorable Little Serial Killers
Post Reply