U.S. Replaces Commander in Afghanistan in War Overhaul

N&P: Discussion of news headlines and politics.

Moderator: frigidmagi

Post Reply
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
19
Location: Alone and unafraid

#1 U.S. Replaces Commander in Afghanistan in War Overhaul

Post by frigidmagi »

NYTime

[quote]The top American commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David D. McKiernan, was forced out Monday in an abrupt shake-up intended to bring a more aggressive and innovative approach to a worsening seven-year war.
Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image
Haraz N. Ghanbari/AP, left; Helene C. Stikkel/Dept. of Defense, via Reuters

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, left, and Gen. David McKiernan, the top American commander in Afghanistan, at Forward Operating Base Airborne in the mountains of Wardak Province, Afghanistan, on Friday.
Readers' Comments

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates announced the decision in terse comments at the Pentagon, saying that “fresh eyes were neededâ€
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
User avatar
LadyTevar
Pleasure Kitten Foreman
Posts: 13197
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:25 pm
18
Location: In your lap, purring
Contact:

#2

Post by LadyTevar »

I'll bow to your expertise there, Frigid.

Will the change in leadership really get this back on track, tho? I can't help but notice the line about how Gen. McKiernan is probably finished in the military. From the article it also sounds like Military Politics -- Petraeus didn't like him, and the 'most recent defense secretaries' didn't support him. So was this political or was this based on his actions (or lack thereof)?
Image

Dogs are Man's Best Friend
Cats are Man's Adorable Little Serial Killers
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
19
Location: Alone and unafraid

#3

Post by frigidmagi »

It's based on several things from what I can tell. One, Afghan went to pot on his watch, whether it's fair or not that will screw your career. Two, he didn't seem to put to much effort into working with the Euros while there, a definite no-no. Three, he stuck to conventional tactics (much like a stereotypical armor general) and even seemed at some points to be resisting using more unorthodox things like Petraeus's COIN methods.

Which was foolish of him really, given that this is the kind of environment COIN was meant for and that Petraeus is the golden boy of the moment.
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
Post Reply