War in Space; how would you do it?

SF: Not to be confused with SyFy....
Robert Walper
Adept
Posts: 1087
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 7:37 am
19

#51

Post by Robert Walper »

Comrade Tortoise wrote:Oh and Walper, here is what yous thip would look like to a UV filter

*snip*
Great. But since my arguement was not accounting for computer enhanced sensors, your picture is just another pointless Red Herring.
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:28 pm
19

#52

Post by Hotfoot »

Robert Walper wrote:
Comrade Tortoise wrote:Oh and Walper, here is what yous thip would look like to a UV filter

*snip*
Great. But since my arguement was not accounting for computer enhanced sensors, your picture is just another pointless Red Herring.
A photon is a photon is a photon. The only thing that really changes is wavelength. Granted, all the different wavelengths photons have different properties, each passing through and being "blocked" by different various types of matter, but in the end, they all follow similar rules.

By the way, fun little fact: Did you know that digital cameras can detect near-infrared light? It's true! You can try it yourself, but you can see the results very clearly in this picture.
Image

It should be noted that this isn't any sort of "computer enhancement", but rather an effect of sensors that are capable of picking up that wavelength of photon.
User avatar
Stofsk
Secret Agent Man
Posts: 1710
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 4:46 pm
19
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

#53

Post by Stofsk »

Hotfoot wrote:If required, I suppose I could dig up some calculations and crunch some numbers to see just how far away we could detect a nice, hot warship, given modern sensors. Especially one that's painted black and turning all that nice visual light into hot hot IR. :)
You make it sound dirty.
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 3769
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:28 pm
19

#54

Post by Hotfoot »

Dirty physics is the best kind. The Kama Inertia is a sight to behold ;)
User avatar
Comrade Tortoise
Exemplar
Posts: 4832
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:33 am
19
Location: Land of steers and queers indeed
Contact:

#55

Post by Comrade Tortoise »

Robert Walper wrote:
Comrade Tortoise wrote:Oh and Walper, here is what yous thip would look like to a UV filter

*snip*
Great. But since my arguement was not accounting for computer enhanced sensors, your picture is just another pointless Red Herring.
And my argument is that black paint is worthless desite the fact that the naked eye wont see it. You fool.

If you want to pull out that "arrogance"line again, WE CAN DETECT IR LIGHT AND UV NOW WITH EXISTING TECH.
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
- Theodosius Dobzhansky

There is no word harsh enough for this. No verbal edge sharp and cold enough to set forth the flaying needed. English is to young and the elder languages of the earth beyond me. ~Frigid

The Holocaust was an Amazing Logistical Achievement~Havoc
User avatar
Knife
Apprentice
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 10:25 am
19
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain, UT.
Contact:

#56

Post by Knife »

Stofsk wrote:People are saying 'stealth is the way to go' but the question is, how do you practice stealth in space?

The UV filter picture shows us that a spaceship sticks out like a sore thumb due to all the heat and radiation a ship emits. How do you control/mask that?
I would imagine that a minimal 'cross section' in a big space would help. Fire up the engines way back at the starting point and accelerate up to speed. Then shut down the engines and 'cruise' to your target. You're still going to emit some radiation, sensors/com and even reflect some radiation and shit from local bodies but it would be minimal. And as long as you're not a gigantic battleship the size of the moon, you might slip through just because of the sheer amount of sky someone would need to scan.
Also, people are saying ECMs will have an impact, but again how so? How will ECMs work?
ECM as most people think of it would depend on what the weapon systems of the society are. But yeah, if it's still radar based and/or if missiles home in with radar or even navigational and targeting data from a 'home ship', then pumping the airwave full of static would still work.

Another good example, though probably more ECCM, would be flares that would serve as decoys. A small missile like device that has an 'engine signiture' like the host ship. Fire off a couple of those in different vectors to confuse enemy sensors.
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature, and has no chance of being free unless made or kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
--John Stuart Mill
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
19
Location: Alone and unafraid

#57

Post by frigidmagi »

Decoys, small parasite drones that when dropped do their best to "look" like a ship. Mainly by throwwing Electronic signals, heat and radition all over the place I would guess.
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman
Sick, Twisted Fuck
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 2:37 pm
19
Location: MENTAL HOSPITAL
Contact:

#58

Post by Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman »

Moon-sized battlestations to neutralize (read: destroy) planets, capital ships as the backbone of the fleet, and starfighters for surgical strikes and exploiting holes. Also, there'll be long-range strategic WMD like Galaxy Guns and such.
The Sick, Twisted Fuck | Sap #2 of the Bitter Trio | Knight of the e-mail | Evil Liberal Conspirator | Esoteric Order of Dagon | Weird TGODer

Share your free D&D character here.

:welcome :arrow: :sheepfucker: :thumbsup

So be it. If saying "NO" means being alone, then to hell with love, with romance, with marriage, and all the shit life keeps pumping at me. I'll walk alone, but with freedom and a healed pride.

NEVER buy a LiteOn CD/DVD Writer. Ever.
User avatar
Ace Pace
Antisemetical Semite
Posts: 2272
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:28 am
19
Location: Cuddling with stress pills
Contact:

#59

Post by Ace Pace »

Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman wrote:Moon-sized battlestations to neutralize (read: destroy) planets, capital ships as the backbone of the fleet, and starfighters for surgical strikes and exploiting holes. Also, there'll be long-range strategic WMD like Galaxy Guns and such.
In your far future dreams, human kind has no where NEAR the ability to create 2-3km long ships in space, nevermind moon sized ships.

And pray tell me what are 1-2 person fighters going to do against a crewed corvette? This isn't air combat where a fighter has a max size before you need far more power to run it, more space is far more usful in space, bigger better sensors, more room to release heat instead of concertrating it, more and better equipted weaponary.

And without FTL, how is a fucking Galaxy Gun going to be usful?
[img=left]http://www.libriumarcana.com/Uploads/Ace/acewip7.jpg[/img]Grand Dolphin Conspiracy
The twin cub, the Cyborg dolphin wolf.

Dorsk 81: this is why I support the separation of Aces eyebrow's, something that ugly should never be joined

Mayabird:You see what this place does to us? It's like how Eskimos have their 16 names for snow. We have to precisely define what shafting we're receiving.

"Do we think Israel would be nuts enough to go back into Lebanon with Olmert still in power and calling the shots? They could hook Sharon up to a heart monitor and interpret the blips and bleeps as "yes" and "no" and do better than that, both strategically and emotionally."
User avatar
Comrade Tortoise
Exemplar
Posts: 4832
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:33 am
19
Location: Land of steers and queers indeed
Contact:

#60

Post by Comrade Tortoise »

Ace Pace wrote:
Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman wrote:Moon-sized battlestations to neutralize (read: destroy) planets, capital ships as the backbone of the fleet, and starfighters for surgical strikes and exploiting holes. Also, there'll be long-range strategic WMD like Galaxy Guns and such.
In your far future dreams, human kind has no where NEAR the ability to create 2-3km long ships in space, nevermind moon sized ships.

And pray tell me what are 1-2 person fighters going to do against a crewed corvette? This isn't air combat where a fighter has a max size before you need far more power to run it, more space is far more usful in space, bigger better sensors, more room to release heat instead of concertrating it, more and better equipted weaponary.

And without FTL, how is a fucking Galaxy Gun going to be usful?
Well, small fighers do have their uses. As mobile weapons platforms, all it would take is a good projectile to puncture a hull
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
- Theodosius Dobzhansky

There is no word harsh enough for this. No verbal edge sharp and cold enough to set forth the flaying needed. English is to young and the elder languages of the earth beyond me. ~Frigid

The Holocaust was an Amazing Logistical Achievement~Havoc
Robert Walper
Adept
Posts: 1087
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 7:37 am
19

#61

Post by Robert Walper »

Comrade Tortoise wrote:As mobile weapons platforms, all it would take is a good projectile to puncture a hull
Assuming you work with some really big capital ships...how many hulls would be practical? I assume you could take the double hull concept pretty far...
User avatar
Ace Pace
Antisemetical Semite
Posts: 2272
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:28 am
19
Location: Cuddling with stress pills
Contact:

#62

Post by Ace Pace »

Double hulls, nevermind redundency, I imagine that not all weapons will be direct hits, those that are direct hits will be leathal, but imagine how easy it is to jink?

I imagine the most widely used weapon will be missles of some sort, nuclear perhaps? Someone who more education then me can add options.

Two problems with space combat, one of detection another of targeting, both linked, targeting relies on sensor systems, non of which are FTL, which leaves timegaps of anything from milliseconds to a few seconds, all crucial.
[img=left]http://www.libriumarcana.com/Uploads/Ace/acewip7.jpg[/img]Grand Dolphin Conspiracy
The twin cub, the Cyborg dolphin wolf.

Dorsk 81: this is why I support the separation of Aces eyebrow's, something that ugly should never be joined

Mayabird:You see what this place does to us? It's like how Eskimos have their 16 names for snow. We have to precisely define what shafting we're receiving.

"Do we think Israel would be nuts enough to go back into Lebanon with Olmert still in power and calling the shots? They could hook Sharon up to a heart monitor and interpret the blips and bleeps as "yes" and "no" and do better than that, both strategically and emotionally."
User avatar
Ace Pace
Antisemetical Semite
Posts: 2272
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:28 am
19
Location: Cuddling with stress pills
Contact:

#63

Post by Ace Pace »

Bump.


To add something, since we focused on tactical aspects...on what would space be fought over?

I assume location is irrelevent, you fight for resources, you can allways let them control some lane if it nets you minable astroids and etc.
[img=left]http://www.libriumarcana.com/Uploads/Ace/acewip7.jpg[/img]Grand Dolphin Conspiracy
The twin cub, the Cyborg dolphin wolf.

Dorsk 81: this is why I support the separation of Aces eyebrow's, something that ugly should never be joined

Mayabird:You see what this place does to us? It's like how Eskimos have their 16 names for snow. We have to precisely define what shafting we're receiving.

"Do we think Israel would be nuts enough to go back into Lebanon with Olmert still in power and calling the shots? They could hook Sharon up to a heart monitor and interpret the blips and bleeps as "yes" and "no" and do better than that, both strategically and emotionally."
User avatar
Surlethe
Initiate
Posts: 236
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 6:30 am
19
Location: Putting off studying for finals ... even after finals are done

#64

Post by Surlethe »

Ace Pace wrote:Bump.


To add something, since we focused on tactical aspects...on what would space be fought over?

I assume location is irrelevent, you fight for resources, you can allways let them control some lane if it nets you minable astroids and etc.
Fight over strategic points and resources. Land and resources will be the most important military loci; oh, did I mention resources?
--CoVD: Every time Vin Diesel kills God, a kitten masturbates.--
Image
BANDWIDTH THIEF
"Forgive you?" Leto's voice was full of sweet reason. "Of course I forgive you. That is your God's function. Your crime is forgiven. However, your stupidity requires a response." ~Frank Herbert, God-Emperor of Dune
ACPATHNTDWATGODW
The Death Brigade
User avatar
Stofsk
Secret Agent Man
Posts: 1710
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 4:46 pm
19
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

#65

Post by Stofsk »

Space is big, and resources are somewhat limitless. If nation x holds star system y which has resources you want/need, why attack them when you can find another star system that isn't claimed?

Same goes for land. Uh, why invade and conquer another planet when you can, y'know, make countless space colonies in orbit of your homeworld?

I'm thinking wars would be fought for ideological grounds. Nation x and nation y hate each other because one's communist and the other is capitalist, or something. However that is about motives for war, not methods. When you go to war you attack the other nation's resource production. That means taking over their factories or bombing them (whichever is more convenient), distrupting their commerce, and cutting their supply lines.
User avatar
Ace Pace
Antisemetical Semite
Posts: 2272
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:28 am
19
Location: Cuddling with stress pills
Contact:

#66

Post by Ace Pace »

Planets are easy, remember space is HUGE, travel times are in decades(unless we get FTL). You conquer a planet because of population, basic stuff such as simple metals is easy to get, manpower to run everything, tax base, etc. isn't. Nevermind finding rare elements.
[img=left]http://www.libriumarcana.com/Uploads/Ace/acewip7.jpg[/img]Grand Dolphin Conspiracy
The twin cub, the Cyborg dolphin wolf.

Dorsk 81: this is why I support the separation of Aces eyebrow's, something that ugly should never be joined

Mayabird:You see what this place does to us? It's like how Eskimos have their 16 names for snow. We have to precisely define what shafting we're receiving.

"Do we think Israel would be nuts enough to go back into Lebanon with Olmert still in power and calling the shots? They could hook Sharon up to a heart monitor and interpret the blips and bleeps as "yes" and "no" and do better than that, both strategically and emotionally."
Hedgecore
Apprentice
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:58 am
19
Location: the left coast

#67

Post by Hedgecore »

VonNuman type ships and invasion forces. Preferably with some type of failsafe controlled by me. The principle of the VonNuman device is that it carries out its task, but at the same time creates more of its self to carry out that task...and then they create more etc etc. Essentially like a virus. Only robots and space ships and such.
The main concern is them becoming self-aware and turning on you, or continuing on for millennia after your war is over.

Or, hiring mercenaries...like Galactus. He eats plantes for breakfast, man...literally. Then again, he was stopped by the Fantastic Four. Come on, the FF? Pfft. More like Mediocre Four if you ask me (woo, lets hear it for un-funny jokes!).
"Well, I wouldn't argue that is was a no holds-barred, adrenalin fuelled thrill ride, but there is no way you
can perpetrate that amount of carnage and mayhem and not incur a considerable amount of paperwork."
-Sgt Nicholas Angel, on Point Break

"You gotta look Death in the face and say, 'Whatever, man.'"
-Hurley
Post Reply