The Swiss air force: Available during business hours only

[frigidmagi]

The Guardian

There's something almost too civilised about a country whose fighter jets stick to office hours (note to would-be terrorists and airspace infiltrators: they also stop for an hour and a half for lunch, and there's no service at weekends). It was French and Italian jet pilots who escorted the Ethiopian Airlines plane hijacked by its co-pilot safely to Geneva airport on Monday morning – because, at 6.02am, it was still nearly two hours before the Swiss air force came to work.

"Switzerland cannot intervene because its airbases are closed at night and on the weekend," spokesman Laurent Savary told AFP. "It's a question of budget and staffing."

It was not always so. The Swiss air force was founded in 1914 with nine pilots. By the 1940s it was well capable of defending its neutral airspace. But in recent years military spending has decreased. Fewer jets have been bought and many of its pilots have become reservists. Now the country relies on its neighbours' military capabilities – last month the Austrian air force helped police Swiss airspace during the World Economic Forum in Davos.

"The capability to provide a 24-hour response with interceptors is currently missing for financial reasons," says David Cenciotti, an Italian journalist who blogs as The Aviationist. "There are agreements with neighbouring countries – Italy and France in particular – that enable fighter jets from both air forces to enter Swiss airspace whenever needed to manage an aerial threat. So the risk is limited. Still, there is a residual risk. If a plane is hijacked over Switzerland and directed to hit a sensitive target within the country fighter jets launched from France or Italy would have little to no chance to intervene."

The Swiss government now wants to spend more than £2bn on 22 new Swedish-made fighter jets. The deal will be put to a referendum in May, though according to recent polls 53% of voters are against it. If it happens, it could mean a move to round-the-clock capabilities from around 2020; bad news for the pilots enjoying those long lunch breaks.

[Josh]

At some point you wonder why they even bother having forces at all. The institutional rot of such a corrupted force would probably do a worse job of gearing up for a conflict than building one from scratch.

[Norseman]

At some point you wonder why they even bother having forces at all. The institutional rot of such a corrupted force would probably do a worse job of gearing up for a conflict than building one from scratch.

I think that is exaggerated. Beside adding funds for training and operations is easy enough and can be done with the stroke of a pen. But in the modern age airplanes and heavy equipment takes quite a bit of time to acquire and requires a lot of infrastructure. So there is something to be said for having and maintaining the kit, but only doing so during office hours.

[Josh]

At some point you wonder why they even bother having forces at all. The institutional rot of such a corrupted force would probably do a worse job of gearing up for a conflict than building one from scratch.

I think that is exaggerated. Beside adding funds for training and operations is easy enough and can be done with the stroke of a pen. But in the modern age airplanes and heavy equipment takes quite a bit of time to acquire and requires a lot of infrastructure. So there is something to be said for having and maintaining the kit, but only doing so during office hours.

It's not the gear, it's the attitude.

I've never been in the military, but I have been around emergency response organizations and the way it works is that if a group isn't pushed to keep sharp and ready, they become useless when a problem crops up. Nobody wants to stick their face in, nobody wants to take responsibility, nobody has functional plans for dealing with anything because why bother doing actual work when you can fuck off at will?