Kit through the ages

GH: General Discussion

Moderator: LadyTevar

Post Reply
User avatar
Josh
Resident of the Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:51 pm
19
Location: Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery

#1 Kit through the ages

Post by Josh »

http://www.tickld.com/x/13-complete-sol ... the-armies

Quoting the link doesn't really do it justice, since the images are the story. The evolution is interesting stuff, especially in the visual demonstration of how miniaturization increases versatility.
When the Frog God smiles, arm yourself.
"'Flammable' and 'inflammable' have the same meaning! This language is insane!"
GIVE ME COFFEE AND I WILL ALLOW YOU TO LIVE!- Frigid
"Ork 'as no automatic code o' survival. 'is partic'lar distinction from all udda livin' gits is tha necessity ta act inna face o' alternatives by means o' dakka."
I created the sound of madness, wrote the book on pain
User avatar
Lys
Master
Posts: 1896
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:37 pm
13

#2 Re: Kit through the ages

Post by Lys »

Very nice Josh, thanks for sharing. However i would like to point out that the first picture has way too many weapons. Specifically there is a dagger, sword, axe, great axe, and spear. The last couple are two-handed weapons which would be far too awkward to ever carry together, and most soldiers would carry a sword, an axe, or a dagger as their backup piece, not all three. A notional Anglo-Saxon infantryman at the battle should have a sword, maybe a dagger, and a great axe or spear. (Also a knife, but mainly as a tool.) The second picture, on the other hand, might actually be okay despite also having the five weapons on display, on account of the fact that it's depicting a mounted knight who benefits from the carrying capacity of a horse. A horse that has itself benefited from nearly two centuries of breeding since Hastings at that. Though i have some doubts about that axe, it looks a bit on the large side, and for that matter the sword looks oddly smallish, though it might just be my eyes deceiving me. Further on, the Agincourt archer is missing his maul. How do you think he drove that huge stake into the ground?
Lys is lily, or lilium.
The pretty flowers remind me of a song of elves.
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#3 Re: Kit through the ages

Post by General Havoc »

I have a suspicion that the author here has in certain cases confused either "all the gear this sort of soldier could have used" with "all the gear this sort of soldier would have been carrying at once." As Lys pointed out, a foot soldier will not be carrying multiple two-handed weapons around if they can avoid it, three different side-arms. A spear, sword, and dagger would be one customary combination. A great axe, throwing spear, and dagger would be another. You wouldn't generally blend the two.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
Josh
Resident of the Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:51 pm
19
Location: Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery

#4 Re: Kit through the ages

Post by Josh »

Yeah, that threw me at first as well but I came to the same conclusion as Havoc. The tradition of paring out the useless shit and working down to the strict essentials ain't exactly a recent thing, and there's no way your average footslogger was going to haul that much steel around Swiss Army Knife-style.
When the Frog God smiles, arm yourself.
"'Flammable' and 'inflammable' have the same meaning! This language is insane!"
GIVE ME COFFEE AND I WILL ALLOW YOU TO LIVE!- Frigid
"Ork 'as no automatic code o' survival. 'is partic'lar distinction from all udda livin' gits is tha necessity ta act inna face o' alternatives by means o' dakka."
I created the sound of madness, wrote the book on pain
Post Reply