HA! To those who have poohed, poohed the crimes of the Saddam regieme, you know who you are, Fuck You.A court in The Hague has ruled that the killing of thousands of Kurds in Iraq in the 1980s was an act of genocide.
The ruling came in the case of Dutch trader Frans van Anraat, who was given a 15-year sentence for selling chemicals to Saddam Hussein's regime.
He was found guilty of complicity in war crimes over a 1988 chemical attack that killed more than 5,000 people, but acquitted of genocide charges.
It is the first trial to deal with war crimes against Kurds in Iraq and Iran.
'Intent to destroy'
Dozens of ethnic Kurds gathered in the packed courtroom to hear the verdict.
The court has no other conclusion than that these attacks were committed with the intent to destroy the Kurdish population of Iraq
Court ruling
Before van Anraat could be convicted, the judges had to decide whether the 1988 attack on Iraqi Kurds in Halabja amounted to genocide.
According to the 1948 Geneva Convention, genocide is defined as "acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group".
The Dutch court said it considered "legally and convincingly proven that the Kurdish population meets requirement under Genocide Conventions as an ethnic group".
"The court has no other conclusion than that these attacks were committed with the intent to destroy the Kurdish population of Iraq," the ruling said.
However, observers say the Dutch court's decision may not have much influence on the Iraqi tribunal, which is hearing the trial of Saddam Hussein.
The court is believed to be preparing a case against him for the use of chemical weapons in Halabja in northern Iraq.
'Contribution'
Van Anraat was not in court to hear the verdict.
Frans van Anraat lived in Iraq for several years
He was charged with supplying thousands of tons of raw materials for chemical weapons used in the 1980-1988 war against Iran, and against Iraqi Kurds.
The court found him guilty of aiding war crimes, as "his deliveries facilitated the attacks".
"He cannot counter with the argument that this would have happened even without his contribution," the presiding judge said.
However, the judges ruled that van Anraat was not aware of the genocidal intentions of the Iraqi regime when he sold the ingredients for poison gas.
Victims' relatives clapped when the sentence was read out, while dozens danced in a circle to drums outside the court.
Defence lawyers said they would appeal against the sentence, which was the maximum that could be imposed for the charge.
The 63-year-old was arrested in 1989 in Italy at the request of the US Government.
He was later released and fled to Iraq, where he remained until 2003.
He was arrested in December 2004 at his Amsterdam home.
1980s Killing of Iraq Kurds ruled genocide
Moderator: frigidmagi
- frigidmagi
- Dragon Death-Marine General
- Posts: 14757
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
- 19
- Location: Alone and unafraid
#1 1980s Killing of Iraq Kurds ruled genocide
BBC
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
#2
Am I the only one that's saying "wow, it's GENOCIDE? how SHOCKING!" when I read this?
To the world's views, it almost always seems that countries in eastern europe, asia, most of africa, and the middle east can commit any sort of mass atrocity and western nations will just go, "Oh, it's just religious intolerance."
Hell, most people are practically unaware of what's going on with the ethnic struggles serbs and kurds anyway. They've probably never heard of what goes on in the balkans or of the mass aboriginal graves discovered a while back in australia.
And most of them probably hadn't even heard the word "tutsi" until they watched 'hotel rwanda.'
The fact that it took so long for this article and this ruling to happen makes me kind of ill.
To the world's views, it almost always seems that countries in eastern europe, asia, most of africa, and the middle east can commit any sort of mass atrocity and western nations will just go, "Oh, it's just religious intolerance."
Hell, most people are practically unaware of what's going on with the ethnic struggles serbs and kurds anyway. They've probably never heard of what goes on in the balkans or of the mass aboriginal graves discovered a while back in australia.
And most of them probably hadn't even heard the word "tutsi" until they watched 'hotel rwanda.'
The fact that it took so long for this article and this ruling to happen makes me kind of ill.
Last edited by Caz on Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- frigidmagi
- Dragon Death-Marine General
- Posts: 14757
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
- 19
- Location: Alone and unafraid
#3
You mean Croats and Serbs right?
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
#4
I worded that kind of badly. I didn't mean they were fighting against each other, I meant to compare their situations. Fixed.frigidmagi wrote:You mean Croats and Serbs right?
Oh, here's the link I meant to include:
http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/scomp.htm
Last edited by Caz on Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.