Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman wrote:How can any nations of mere hundreds planet has the capacity to produce enough WMD to wipe out a nation of twelve million planets?
How many of those are useless shitholes like Tatooine? The devices will be deployed on the most significant targets, lobbing the head off the Empire and crippling a portion of their infrastructure faster than you can say "collateral damage".
In the disarray with their government being vapourized, the power vacuum will lead to in-fighting which will be even more destructive.
And that's assuming that the bigger nation just sitting there, without using their own WMD, and without attempting to defend or retaliate whatsoever.
First, we wouldn't actually deploy these doomsday devices until their is no other choice, so by the time that happens, we have already lost.
Hence the term "
Mutually Assured Destruction". The moment anyone starts to use them, everyone is dead.
That also plays nicely with the desire of the game to end in armageddon so we can play a clean slate post-apocalyptic PW IV.
That's also why Iran could not make the United States "cease to exist", despite the fact they have nuclear facilities now.
Suppose they could deliver megaton devices to Washington, New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas and Redmond all at once.
The United States's ability to project military and economic power would be greatly reduced, making them no longer a superpower over night. That is what I am talking about.
Based on your last post, it took a number of bomb that only take a small portion of the Death Star.
That was also a small enough explosive to smuggle aboard in hand held canisters. We have planet killer bombs, as were a major part of my own plot section in "Ra Goes on a Killing Spree". These would be orders of magnitude more powerful than a tiny cylinder of antimatter. Or, the Mark IX gatebusters Ra has are possibly in the
teraton range, and would cause a fireball hundreds of kilometres in size itself (see
Beachhead [SG-1] for an example of this fireball being huge, even when seen from space), which would certainly hit the central reactor and cause secondary explosions, destroying the station.
but how the A'millan terrorist would ever reach the reactor on the first place?
They don't have to with a large enough explosion. Sit in a docking port and detonate the device.
And I prefer the term 'freedom fighter'.
And besides, after the first bombing, it would be ridiculous to assume that the Death Star won't increase its security.
Unless they are letting nothing at all even dock with it, it doesn't matter. The weapons we would use here are so ridiculusly powerful that even from the outer sections they would blow it to hell.
That's why bombing attack (like London bombing) can take months (or at least weeks) to prepare.
These guys also aren't professionals with the full backing of multiple great power nations. Dock, detonate, game over.
The first bombing was already wanking, because it implied that it was THAT easy to smuggle bombs into the Death Star (try smuggling bombs into the US and you know what I mean).
Act of plot, too. If that didn't occur, nothing would have happened this game at all, except for bloodthirsty Imperials killing some Zerg. How fun!
And another act of plot is going to have to kill that battlestation. You can't just sit there with an unstoppable station. The game is unbalanced enough with the mere presence of the Galactic Empire (complete with EU wanknology, no less), and an unstoppable Death Star is absurd. Sometimes sacrifices have to be made for the greater plot.