Human Enchanment Fallout?

SF: Not to be confused with SyFy....
Post Reply
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
19
Location: Alone and unafraid

#1 Human Enchanment Fallout?

Post by frigidmagi »

Let's play a game of pretend. Let's say there is a proceedure that when proformed on a fetus in the womb makes a smarter and overall better child. Let's also say that those who do not go through this proceedure cannot compete at all against those who have. It's also very expensive.

At what point does this become a right worth fighting and killing over?
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
Robert Walper
Adept
Posts: 1087
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 7:37 am
19

#2

Post by Robert Walper »

I'd personally say it should be a mandatory operation done to fetuses funded by the government. Parents trying to intervene or stop the procedure could be charged with abuse towards a potential human being.

Unfortunately, it wouldn't be that simple. *grumbles*
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
19
Location: Alone and unafraid

#3

Post by frigidmagi »

I'd personally say it should be a mandatory operation done to fetuses funded by the government. Parents trying to intervene or stop the procedure could be charged with abuse towards a potential human being.
Yes, but you know it won't start out that way. I'm asking at what point will people begin to see this has a right worth committing voilence to obtain.
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
User avatar
Ace Pace
Antisemetical Semite
Posts: 2272
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:28 am
19
Location: Cuddling with stress pills
Contact:

#4

Post by Ace Pace »

The moment they realise their kids are being cut out from the job force because of it.
[img=left]http://www.libriumarcana.com/Uploads/Ace/acewip7.jpg[/img]Grand Dolphin Conspiracy
The twin cub, the Cyborg dolphin wolf.

Dorsk 81: this is why I support the separation of Aces eyebrow's, something that ugly should never be joined

Mayabird:You see what this place does to us? It's like how Eskimos have their 16 names for snow. We have to precisely define what shafting we're receiving.

"Do we think Israel would be nuts enough to go back into Lebanon with Olmert still in power and calling the shots? They could hook Sharon up to a heart monitor and interpret the blips and bleeps as "yes" and "no" and do better than that, both strategically and emotionally."
User avatar
Cynical Cat
Arch-Magician
Posts: 11930
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:53 pm
19
Location: Ice Sarcophagus outside a ruined Jedi Temple
Contact:

#5

Post by Cynical Cat »

Ace has hit the nail on the head. Once they realize that their kids future depends upon getting this procedure, they will fight to get it.
It's not that I'm unforgiving, it's that most of the people who wrong me are unrepentant assholes.
User avatar
Comrade Tortoise
Exemplar
Posts: 4832
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:33 am
19
Location: Land of steers and queers indeed
Contact:

#6

Post by Comrade Tortoise »

Either that, or the proceedure would be banned
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
- Theodosius Dobzhansky

There is no word harsh enough for this. No verbal edge sharp and cold enough to set forth the flaying needed. English is to young and the elder languages of the earth beyond me. ~Frigid

The Holocaust was an Amazing Logistical Achievement~Havoc
User avatar
Stofsk
Secret Agent Man
Posts: 1710
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 4:46 pm
19
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

#7 Re: Human Enchanment Fallout?

Post by Stofsk »

frigidmagi wrote:At what point does this become a right worth fighting and killing over?
I don't think it can be considered a right to fight and kill over.

Does a black man/asian/whatever have the right to fight and kill over being discriminated against in a job market? It's still murder.

As for should it be regulated against: well should it? After all, in today's job market those with a piece of paper that says when they graduated and from which university matters more to a potential employer than those applicants who don't have that piece of paper. Is that bad? The applicant who went to university must have paid an awful lot of money to do so.
Last edited by Stofsk on Wed Aug 03, 2005 12:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Comrade Tortoise
Exemplar
Posts: 4832
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:33 am
19
Location: Land of steers and queers indeed
Contact:

#8

Post by Comrade Tortoise »

I figure if a person hs the proceeure, they are entitled to use it. it is the same as having a college education. it entitles certain benefits and makes one more qualified. It is the same as going to the gym to make oneself stronger, or getting special training to better perform at one's job.
"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
- Theodosius Dobzhansky

There is no word harsh enough for this. No verbal edge sharp and cold enough to set forth the flaying needed. English is to young and the elder languages of the earth beyond me. ~Frigid

The Holocaust was an Amazing Logistical Achievement~Havoc
User avatar
Mayabird
Leader of the Marching Band
Posts: 1635
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 7:53 pm
19
Location: IA > GA
Contact:

#9

Post by Mayabird »

Comrade Tortoise wrote:Either that, or the proceedure would be banned
But then of course the richest people would still secretly be getting the procedure done on their kids because the rules don't apply to people with lots of money. And afterwards, what are people going to do, repossess the kids?

Side questions: Is this some sort of "Flowers for Algernon" type surgery or genetic enhancements that can be passed on? And what about if the surgery is done on kids that are going to be born with Downs Syndrome or the like?
Post Reply