![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v614/hteres/cnb1_m.jpg)
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v614/hteres/cnb2_m.jpg)
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v614/hteres/cnb3_m_NSFW.jpg)
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v614/hteres/cnb4_m.jpg)
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v614/hteres/cnb5_m.jpg)
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v614/hteres/nsb1_m.jpg)
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v614/hteres/nsb2_m.jpg)
Moderator: frigidmagi
I mostly draw in my notebooks at school..I don't have time to draw at home (Since I spend 6-12 hours at school 6 days aweek and can't draw on Shabbat - the religous Saturday) :sad:Don't draw on note pads.
Can you show me where exactly?Remember carefully proportion, though, with the other parts of the body, and perspective in general--both are largely alright in your drawings but sometimes seem a bit borderline
Can't you buy a visual diary?Hashava wrote:I mostly draw in my notebooks at school..I don't have time to draw at home (Since I spend 6-12 hours at school 6 days aweek and can't draw on Shabbat - the religous Saturday) :sad:Don't draw on note pads.
Well, basically,the definition of the "labour" you're talking about is any activity that is "creative" - for example, turning the light on "creates" something new (just like turning it off- anything that changes the current state of an object is "labour")P.S. If I may inquire, what precisely is the religious justification for not using electricity? The others make sense as abstaining from labour, but the electricity one is a bit of a conundrum for me.
Thank you for the clarification.Hashava wrote:
Well, basically,the definition of the "labour" you're talking about is any activity that is "creative" - for example, turning the light on "creates" something new (just like turning it off- anything that changes the current state of an object is "labour")
The reason is that this was in the middle of a lecture on psychological exam and as an example we were walked through the exam of a 9 year old boy. In one image there was a teacup, the boy could not stop talking about the teacup.Batman wrote:Maybe if we could see ALL the writing related to it there might be a hint as to the reason why it's there?
And as usual, damn nice work, Hashava.
It was mostly idle curiousity on my part what with the writing apparently being english and thus at least theoretically intelligible to me.Ace Pace wrote:The reason is that this was in the middle of a lecture on psychological exam and as an example we were walked through the exam of a 9 year old boy. In one image there was a teacup, the boy could not stop talking about the teacup.Batman wrote:Maybe if we could see ALL the writing related to it there might be a hint as to the reason why it's there?
And as usual, damn nice work, Hashava.
That's mostly it.
Tease.Now about some of the other writing on the paper, it's a good thing you can't read my handwriting. Or Hashs.![]()
Some of it seems to be English, some not.Batman wrote:It was mostly idle curiousity on my part what with the writing apparently being english and thus at least theoretically intelligible to me.
You win one(1) internet cookie for being able to read my handwriting. Hashs response thankfully is in another language.Petrosjko wrote:Some of it seems to be English, some not.Batman wrote:It was mostly idle curiousity on my part what with the writing apparently being english and thus at least theoretically intelligible to me.
I can make out 'Someone is staring up the skirt' and 'I say, that's rude!' with 'British' underneath it. Nothing too scandalous.
Not that we're looking for scandals or anything.