Wasilla under Palin: Charged rape victims for tests.

N&P: Discussion of news headlines and politics.

Moderator: frigidmagi

Post Reply
User avatar
SirNitram
The All-Seeing Eye
Posts: 5178
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
19
Location: Behind you, duh!
Contact:

#1 Wasilla under Palin: Charged rape victims for tests.

Post by SirNitram »

Link
ANCHORAGE - Gov. Tony Knowles recently signed legislation protecting victims of sexual assault from being billed for tests to collect evidence of the crime, but one local police chief said the new law will further burden taxpayers.The new law makes it illegal for any law enforcement agency to bill victims or victims insurance companies for the costs of examinations that take place to collect evidence of a sexual assault or determine if a sexual assault did occur.

We would never bill the victim of a burglary for fingerprinting and photographing the crime scene, or for the cost of gathering other evidence, Knowles said. Nor should we bill rape victims just because the crime scene happens to be their bodies.

While the Alaska State Troopers and most municipal police agencies have covered the cost of exams, which cost between $300 to $1,200 apiece, the Wasilla police department does charge the victims of sexual assault for the tests.

Wasilla Police Chief Charlie Fannon does not agree with the new legislation, saying the law will require the city and communities to come up with more funds to cover the costs of the forensic exams.

In the past weve charged the cost of exams to the victims insurance company when possible. I just dont want to see any more burden put on the taxpayer, Fannon said.

According to Fannon, the new law will cost the Wasilla Police Department approximately $5,000 to $14,000 a year to collect evidence for sexual assault cases.

Ultimately it is the criminal who should bear the burden of the added costs, Fannon said.

The forensic exam is just one part of the equation. Id like to see the courts make these people pay restitution for these things, Fannon said.

Fannon said he intends to include the cost of exams required to collect evidence in a restitution request as a part of a criminals sentencing.

Palmer police chief Laren Zager said that to his knowledge, no sexual assault victim has ever been billed by the city of Palmer for an exam to collect evidence of a crime. Zager, who has been police chief since January, said he would never expect a victim to be burdened with the cost of a police investigation.

Im prepared to pay every dime in an investigation. As long as I am chief, I would never bill a victim, Zager said.

The new bill would also make law enforcement agencies that are investigating a sexual assault responsible for the costs of testing victims for sexually transmitted diseases and emergency contraception.

The governor signed House Bill 270, sponsored by Rep. Eric Croft, D-Anchorage, outside the Sexual Assault Response Team (SART) exam room at Alaska Regional Hospital. In attendance at the signing were members of victims advocate groups, law enforcement agencies and legislators.
Sorry you were raped! Here's the invoice.

Thankfully, they've changed the law now. But once again, we see how extremist this shit is.
Half-Damned, All Hero.

Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.

I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
User avatar
Mayabird
Leader of the Marching Band
Posts: 1635
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 7:53 pm
19
Location: IA > GA
Contact:

#2

Post by Mayabird »

You'd think they were getting enough pork barrel money to cover it.

Hmm, how realistic is it that they could make the criminals, once charged, also literally pay for the crime on top of whatever jail time they do?
I :luv: DPDarkPrimus!

Storytime update 8/31: Frigidmagi might be amused by this one.
User avatar
SirNitram
The All-Seeing Eye
Posts: 5178
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
19
Location: Behind you, duh!
Contact:

#3

Post by SirNitram »

Mayabird wrote:You'd think they were getting enough pork barrel money to cover it.

Hmm, how realistic is it that they could make the criminals, once charged, also literally pay for the crime on top of whatever jail time they do?
Difficult to codify into criminal law, however the option always exists to file civil case for the relevent costs.
Half-Damned, All Hero.

Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.

I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
User avatar
Something Awesome
Initiate
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 7:44 pm
18
Location: Somewhere Awesome
Contact:

#4

Post by Something Awesome »

SirNitram wrote:
Mayabird wrote:You'd think they were getting enough pork barrel money to cover it.

Hmm, how realistic is it that they could make the criminals, once charged, also literally pay for the crime on top of whatever jail time they do?
Difficult to codify into criminal law, however the option always exists to file civil case for the relevent costs.
Something like that is in New York State law: once convicted of a crime, you're charged things like a mandatory surcharge, a crime victims' assistance fee, a DNA registration fee, a Sex Offender Database Registration fee (these last two only for certain offenses), and then restitution that would go to the victim if appropriate, as well as a few others specific to certain offenses (DWIs have tons of related fees).

It would seem likely that any cost for a test like that could be included in the restitution or CVAF, or in some new fee. These fees are either paid while in prison if possible or after their release. It's often a term of parole or probation that these fees get paid, but it isn't always easy to enforce it. The costs also can get really high (often totaling in the thousands for DWIs) which can be a problem when a large fraction of the crime-committing population has financial worries / low education, etc.

I would imagine that most other states have similar fees.
Post Reply