Steel "GOP back to principals no more apologies"

N&P: Discussion of news headlines and politics.

Moderator: frigidmagi

Post Reply
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
19
Location: Alone and unafraid

#1 Steel "GOP back to principals no more apologies"

Post by frigidmagi »

CNN
Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele will tell GOP state leaders Tuesday that they must embrace conservative principles, focus their efforts on rebuilding the party and highlight the policy differences between Republican ideals and President Obama's agenda.

"The era of apologizing for Republican mistakes of the past is now officially over," Steele will say in a speech to the RNC's 2009 State Chairmen's Meeting, according to excerpts obtained by CNN. "It is done. We have turned the page, we have turned the corner. No more looking in the review mirror. From this point forward, we will focus all of our energies on winning the future."

Congressional Republicans, who were loyal to President Bush throughout a majority of his two terms, largely sought to break with him in the 2008 elections because he had become a political liability.Over the past few months, GOP lawmakers have acknowledged that the party moved away from one of its core principles of smaller government and less federal spending during the Bush era.

Steele, who was elected to head the party in January, will say the GOP is now "beginning to rally" at the grassroots level after losing control of the White House and additional seats in the Senate and House in November.

Watch the speech on CNN.com/live at 1 p.m. ET

"Those of you who actually attend Lincoln Day dinners, county party events, and tea parties…those of you who toil in the vineyards, spending time in communities, in diners, barber shops, and coffee shops where real every day people can be found…you know it is real," Steele will say, according to the excerpts.

The RNC chairman faces a difficult task of keeping the party united as different political factions maneuver to try and influence what political direction the GOP should head. Social conservatives argue that the party needs to return to its roots on issues such as abortion and stem cell research while centrists counter the GOP needs to be welcoming of all Republicans including those who believe in a more liberal political ideology.

Already, there have been casualties in this political fight. Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter recently became a Democrat, saying that he realized his political views were no longer in line with the Republican Party, and admitting he would have faced a difficult GOP primary in his re-election bid. Former Virginia Rep. Tom Davis, who is now the president of the centrist organization Republican Main Street Partnership, told CNN he thought Specter "was pushed" out of the party, and warned that other centrist GOP lawmakers might also leave if they no longer feel welcomed.

And in a recent appearance on CBS' Face the Nation, former Vice President Dick Cheney said he preferred conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh over his former colleague, Secretary of State Colin Powell, when it came to Republican politics. Powell had endorsed Obama over Republican nominee John McCain in the 2008 election.

In his speech, Steele will point to the late President Ronald Reagan, the architect of the modern-day Republican Party, to explain his own view on the GOP's future.

"As conservatives we must stop acting like we don't really believe in our principles," Steele will say. "Too often we act as if we are scared to apply our timeless principles to today's problems and challenges… For Reagan's conservatism to take root in the next generation we must offer genuine solutions that are relevant to this age."

And when it comes to the president, Steele will charge that on the campaign trail "Obama was very moderate in his views," but that since taking office the president "could not possibly be further to the far left."

"We are going to take this President on with class, we are going to take this President on with dignity," Steele will say. "This will be a very sharp and marked contrast to the shabby and classless way that the Democrats and the far left spoke of the last President."

The RNC meeting wraps up on Wednesday with a scheduled vote on a controversial resolution that calls on Democrats to rename their party the "Democrat Socialist Party."
Several questions come to mind...

1: When did the era of Republicans apologizing for past mistakes start? Because I missed that one and damn if I ain't sorry for that.

2: Take on the President with dignity and class? Where did you find a big enough gag for Mr. Limbaugh?

3: When did the rules change so you could pick your opponents name for them? Because I have a list of possible names for quite a few groups if that happened.
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#2

Post by General Havoc »

Despite Steele's idiocies, this is actually the beginning of the road to recovery for the Republican party.

Yes, you heard me.

The process here with the Republicans is going to be traumatic for them. They need to radicalize before they can recover. The Democrats had to do this too in the 80s, and it took them more than a decade to do so. This effort by Steele and the right wing will fail, but it is actually the start of what they need to do.

The GOP will radicalize, it will push moderates out, it will become more and more shrill. It will run, if not Sarah Palin, then someone of the same mold as Sarah Palin come 2012. This person will get buried, horribly. The same will happen in 2010's congressional elections, and perhaps even in 2014's. It will take that long for the radicalism version of the Republican agenda to get burned out of their system.

Successive electoral defeats however are one of the easiest ways to knock sense into a political party. What the Republicans need is enough of a beating at the hands of the Democratic party to force them to accept that the way to victory is to open towards the center, not to exclude people from power. They need a Bill Clinton of some sort, a moderate who can come to the fore and drag the party back into competition. The process of getting one may take as long as a decade, but this is (paradoxically) the first step.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
SirNitram
The All-Seeing Eye
Posts: 5178
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
19
Location: Behind you, duh!
Contact:

#3

Post by SirNitram »

While I agree, some part of me is chilled by the fact that the undermining of reforms by Democrats against Obama means we might well see this increasingly unhinged hyper-conservative wing gain power. It's quite possibly a fear that will never be realized, but we'll see.
Half-Damned, All Hero.

Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.

I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
User avatar
SirNitram
The All-Seeing Eye
Posts: 5178
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
19
Location: Behind you, duh!
Contact:

#4

Post by SirNitram »

Naturally, there shall be no apologies for THIS either!

[quote]He went on to say, “The Republican Party’s credibility as the reliably conservative choice has been damaged, and it’s up to us to fix it. Faith, freedom, personal responsibility, respect for life and prosperityâ€
Half-Damned, All Hero.

Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.

I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
User avatar
The Minx
Pleasure Kitten
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:29 pm
17

#5

Post by The Minx »

Some of the comments are nothing less than amazing.

[quote]Michael Steel gave a speech recently outlining Hussein’s “Reign of Errorâ€
Last edited by The Minx on Thu May 21, 2009 8:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
19
Location: Alone and unafraid

#6

Post by frigidmagi »

The California vote wasn't a rejection of liberalism. It was sheer insanity. The Californians refused to accept tax raises to pay for the government services they wanted, but they have also been pretty straight forward about demanding those services remain.

California remains the biggest argument against the referendum system on the planet.
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
User avatar
SirNitram
The All-Seeing Eye
Posts: 5178
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:13 pm
19
Location: Behind you, duh!
Contact:

#7

Post by SirNitram »

Yea. California is a deeply broken state because of it's referendum system. All that is required to realize this is that their Consitution has been altered 500 times, and is 147 pages long.
Half-Damned, All Hero.

Tev: You're happy. You're Plotting. You're Evil.
Me: Evil is so inappropriate. I'm ruthless.
Tev: You're turning me on.

I Am Rage. You Will Know My Fury.
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
19
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#8

Post by General Havoc »

This is where I'd normally leap to the defense of the CA referendum system, but honestly this latest debacle has robbed me of all stomach for it. I still say that it exists for a reason, and that reason is uselessly incompetent state politicians (moreso even than the average), but it plainly doesn't work.

The problem is, I don't see what to replace it with.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
rhoenix
The Artist formerly known as Rhoenix
Posts: 7998
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:01 pm
17
Location: "Here," for varying values of "here."
Contact:

#9

Post by rhoenix »

General Havoc wrote:The problem is, I don't see what to replace it with.
The facetious answer would be "something that works," but less facetiously, making it far more difficult to edit the state Constitution would be a good start.

I think its telling that most of the opinions I hear from other Californians are mostly "I don't care, just put it out of its misery and get one that works."
"Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self-esteem, make sure that you are not, in fact, just surrounded by assholes."

- William Gibson


Josh wrote:What? There's nothing weird about having a pet housefly. He smuggles cigarettes for me.
Post Reply